Holooly Plus Logo

Question 3.8: A load P is hung from the end of a rigid beam AD, which is s......

A load P is hung from the end of a rigid beam AD, which is supported by a pin at end A and by two uniform hanger rods (see Fig. 1). How much load, to the nearest 100 pounds, can be applied without exceeding an allowable tensile stress of σ_{\text{allow}} = 30 ksi in either of the rods? Assume small-angle
rotation of AD.

لقطة الشاشة 2023-02-14 131721
The 'Blue Check Mark' means that this solution was answered by an expert.
Learn more on how do we answer questions.

Plan the Solution This problem is not quite as straightforward as the previous one that served to introduce statically indeterminate structures.
Now the load is unknown, but the allowable axial stresses are known. Since the axial stress in an element is just the (internal) axial force in the element divided by its area, it is clear that we must eventually get equations that relate F_1 and F_2, the axial forces in the two rods, to the load P.
Let us begin by writing down the three fundamental types of equations.
Equilibrium: We must ask ourselves the question: What free-body diagram(s) would lead to an equilibrium equation (or equations) that relate the external load P to the internal element forces F_1 and F_2? Clearly, a free-body diagram of the rigid beam AD should be used.
Since we are not specifically asked to determine the reactions A_x and A_y, we do not need to sum forces. A moment equation for the free-body diagram in Fig. 2 will directly relate F_1 and F_2 to P, so we write

+\circlearrowleft\left(\sum{M} \right) _A = 0 :  aF_1 + bF_2 – cP = 0      Equilibrium (1)

Since there are two unknown forces and only one equilibrium equation, the structure is statically indeterminate. Since the beam AD could be supported by just one hanger rod, one of the rods is redundant.
Element Force-Deformation Behavior: It will be convenient to use the form given in Eq. 3.14.

e = fF,  \text{where}  f ≡ \frac{L}{AE}        (3.14)

e_1 = f_1F_1, e_2 = f_2F_2    Element Force-Deformation Behavior      (2)

where the values of the flexibility coefficients for the hanger rods, labeled (1) and (2) in Fig. 1, are

f_1 = \left(\frac{L}{AE}\right)_1 = \frac{80  in.}{(1.0  in^2)(10 \times 10^3  ksi)} = 8.00 (10^{-3}) in./kip

f_2 = \left(\frac{L}{AE}\right)_2 = \frac{50  in.}{(0.5  in^2)(10 \times 10^3  ksi)} = 10.00 (10^{-3}) in./kip

Geometry of Deformation: Because AD is assumed to be rigid, we can sketch a deformation diagram that relates the elongations of the hanger rods to the rotation of the beam AD about A (Fig. 3). Since the rotation angle θ is assumed to be small, we can assume that points B and C move vertically downward (instead of along arcs of circles with centers at A), and we can therefore use the properties of similar triangles to get the compatibility equation

e_2 = \left(\frac{b}{a}\right)e_1    Deformation Geometry  (3)

Therefore, the rigid beam constrains the two hanger-rod elongations to satisfy this compatibility equation.
Solution of the Equations: To solve for the internal forces, we can eliminate the element elongations, e_1 and e_2, by substituting the force-deformation equations into the compatibility equation to get the following compatibility equation in terms of the unknown element forces.

f_2F_2 = \left(\frac{b}{a}\right)f_1F_1    Compatibility in Terms of Forces  (4)

In Eqs. (1) and (4) we have two equations in terms of the two unknown internal forces. These can be \underline{\text{solved simultaneously}} to give expressions that relate the forces F_1 and F_2 to the external load P.

F_1 = \left( \frac{acf_2} {a^2f_2 + b^2f_1}\right) P      (5a,b)

F_2 = \left( \frac{acf_1} {a^2_2f_2 + b^2f_1}\right) P

Allowable Load: Let us now substitute numerical values from Fig. 1 and numerical values for the flexibility coefficients f_1 and f_2 into Eqs. (5). From Eqs. (5),

F_1 = \left(\frac{15}{21}\right)P,        F_2 = \left(\frac{24}{21}\right)P,  (6a,b)
Now we can relate the external load P to the allowable stress. With F_1 and F_2 given by Eqs. (6), we get the following expressions for the stresses in the rods:

σ_1 = \frac{F_1}{A_1} = \frac{(15/21)(P  kips)}{(1.0  in^2)}    (7a,b)

σ_2 = \frac{F_2}{A_2} = \frac{(24/21)(P  kips)}{(0.5  in^2)} > σ_1

Since rod (2) is more highly stressed than rod (1), we set σ_2 equal to the allowable stress and get

P_{\text{allow}} = \frac{21} {24} (0.5  in^2)σ_{\text{allow}} = 13.1 kips

Review the Solution One way to verify the results is to check compatibility.

Is      f_2F_2 = \left(\frac{a}{b}\right) f_1F_1?         Yes

[10.00(10^{-3}) in./kip] \left(\frac{24}{21}\right) P(kips) =

\left(\frac{100  in.} {50  in.}\right) [8.00(10^{-3}) in./kip] \left(\frac{15} {21}\right) P(kips)

لقطة الشاشة 2023-02-14 170348
لقطة الشاشة 2023-02-14 170408

Related Answered Questions