We are determined to provide the latest solutions related to all subjects FREE of charge!

Please sign up to our reward program to support us in return and take advantage of the incredible listed offers.

Enjoy Limited offers, deals & Discounts by signing up to Holooly Rewards Program


Advertise your business, and reach millions of students around the world.


All the data tables that you may search for.


For Arabic Users, find a teacher/tutor in your City or country in the Middle East.


Find the Source, Textbook, Solution Manual that you are looking for in 1 click.


Need Help? We got you covered.

Chapter 20

Q. 20.11

Consider the PCM distillation column module of Appendix E with the following variables:

CVs: Overhead Composition \left(x_{D}\right) and Bottom Compo\operatorname{sition}\left(x_{B}\right)

MVs: Reflux Ratio (R) and Vapor Flow Rate (V) DV: Column Feed Flow Rate (F)

Do the following, using the transfer function models given below:

(a) Design an MPC system using the following design parameters: \Delta t=60 s , Q = diagonal [0.1,0.1], R = diagonal [0.1,1] P=40, M=1.

(b) Repeat part (a) for the same design parameters, but where Q = diagonal [0.5,0.5]

(c) Simulate the two MPC controllers for a step change in the set point for Overhead Composition \left(x_{D}\right) from 0.85 to 0.80.

(d) Repeat part (c) for a step change in the set point for Bottom Composition \left(x_{B}\right) from 0.15 to 0.2.

(e) (Optional-disturbance test) Repeat part (c) for a step change in the Column Feed Flow Rate (F) from 0.025 to 0.03.

(f) Based on your results from parts (c)-(e), which MPC controller is superior? Justify your answer.

Process transfer function matrix (all times in minutes):

\begin{matrix} X_{D} \\ X_{B}\end{matrix}\overset{\begin{matrix} R  & V\end{matrix} }{\left|\begin{array}{cc}\frac{0.14 e^{-0.94 s}}{14 s+1} & \frac{-9.0 e^{-18.6 s}}{20 s+1} \\\frac{0.16 e^{-3.7 s}}{17 s+1} & \frac{-14 e^{-0.22 s}}{10 s+1}\end{array}\right|}


Verified Solution

We repeat 20.10 for R \left[\begin{array}{ll}0.1 & 0.1\end{array}\right], Q =\left[\begin{array}{ll}0.1 & 1\end{array}\right] and (a) M =1 and (b) M =4

First we evaluate the controller response to a step change in the oxygen concentration setpoint from 0.922 to 1.0143.

Next we test a step change in the hydrocarbon flow rate from 0.035  m ^{3} / min to 0.038  m ^{3} / min.