Products
Rewards 
from HOLOOLY

We are determined to provide the latest solutions related to all subjects FREE of charge!

Please sign up to our reward program to support us in return and take advantage of the incredible listed offers.

Enjoy Limited offers, deals & Discounts by signing up to Holooly Rewards Program

HOLOOLY 
BUSINESS MANAGER

Advertise your business, and reach millions of students around the world.

HOLOOLY 
TABLES

All the data tables that you may search for.

HOLOOLY 
ARABIA

For Arabic Users, find a teacher/tutor in your City or country in the Middle East.

HOLOOLY 
TEXTBOOKS

Find the Source, Textbook, Solution Manual that you are looking for in 1 click.

HOLOOLY 
HELP DESK

Need Help? We got you covered.

Chapter 20

Q. 20.10

Consider the PCM furnace module of Appendix E with the following variables ( H C denotes hydrocarbon):

CVs: HC exit temperature T_{H C} and oxygen exit concentration c_{ O _{2}}

MVs: fuel gas flow rate F_{F G} and air flow rate F_{A} DV: HC flow rate F_{H C}

Do the following, using the transfer function models given below:

(a) Design an MPC system using the following design parameters: \Delta t=1  \min , Q = diagonal [0.1,1], R = diagonal [0.1,0.1], P=20, and M =1.

(b) Repeat part (a) for the same design parameters, but where R = diagonal [0.5,0.5].

(c) Simulate the two MPC controllers for a step change in the c_{ O _{2}} set point to 1.0143  mol / m ^{3} at t=10 min.

(d) Repeat part (c) for a step change in F_{H C} at t=10 min to 0.035  m ^{3} / min.

(e) Based on your results for parts (c) and (d), which MPC controller is superior? Justify your answer.

Process transfer function matrix:

\begin{matrix} T_{HC} \\ C_{O_{2}}\end{matrix}\overset{\begin{matrix} F_{FG}  & F_{A}\end{matrix} }{\left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{220 e^{-2 s}}{6.5 s+1} & \frac{-13 e^{-2 s}}{6.2 s+1} \\\frac{-2.0 e^{-4 s}}{3.8 s+1} & \frac{0.14 e^{-4 s}}{4.2 s+1}\end{array}\right]}

Step-by-Step

Verified Solution

Note: These results were generated using the PCM Furnace Module, MPC option

c) C_{ O _{2}} Set-point change

The set-point responses in Figs. S20.10a and. S20.10b demonstrate that increasing the elements of the R matrix makes the controller more conservative and results in more sluggish responses.

d) Step disturbance in hydrocarbon flow rate

The disturbance responses in Fig. S20.10b are sluggish after an initial oscillatory period, and the two MVs change very slowly. When the diagonal elements of the R matrix are increased to 0.5, the disturbance responses are even more sluggish.