Products
Rewards 
from HOLOOLY

We are determined to provide the latest solutions related to all subjects FREE of charge!

Please sign up to our reward program to support us in return and take advantage of the incredible listed offers.

Enjoy Limited offers, deals & Discounts by signing up to Holooly Rewards Program

HOLOOLY 
BUSINESS MANAGER

Advertise your business, and reach millions of students around the world.

HOLOOLY 
TABLES

All the data tables that you may search for.

HOLOOLY 
ARABIA

For Arabic Users, find a teacher/tutor in your City or country in the Middle East.

HOLOOLY 
TEXTBOOKS

Find the Source, Textbook, Solution Manual that you are looking for in 1 click.

HOLOOLY 
HELP DESK

Need Help? We got you covered.

Chapter 15

Q. 15.3

It is desired to reduce the concentration of CO _{2} in the flue gas from a coal-fired power plant, in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The effluent flue gas is sent to an ammonia scrubber, where most of the CO _{2} is absorbed in a liquid ammonia solution, as shown in Fig. E15.3. A feedforward control system will be used to control the CO _{2} concentration in the flue gas stream leaving the scrubber C _{ CO _{2}} which cannot be measured on-line. The flow rate of the ammonia solution entering the scrubber Q_{A} can be manipulated via a control valve. The inlet flue gas flow rate Q_{F} is a measured disturbance variable.

(a) Draw a block diagram of the feedforward control system. (It is n o t necessary to derive transfer functions.)

(b) Design a feedforward control system to reduce CO _{2} emissions based on a steady-state design (Eq. 15-40).

G_{f}=K_{f}=\frac{-K_{d}}{K_{v} K_{t} K_{p}}           (15-40)

Available Information:

(i) The flow sensor-transmitter and the control valve have negligible dynamics.

(ii) The flow sensor-transmitter has a steady-state gain of 0.08  mA /( L / min ) .

(iii) The control valve has a steady-state gain of 4 ( gal / min ) / mA .

(iv) The following steady-state data are available for a series of changes in Q_{A} :

Q_{A}( gal / min ) C_{C O_{2}}( ppm )
15 125
30 90
45 62

(v) The following steady-state data are available for a series of changes in Q_{F},

Q_{F}( L / min ) C_{C O_{2}}( ppm )
100 75
200 96
300 122

Step-by-Step

Verified Solution

(a) Block diagram of the feedforward control system

(b) Feedforward design based on a steady-state analysis

The starting point in feedforward controller design is Eq. 15-21. For a design based on a steady-state analysis, the transfer functions in (15-21) are replaced by their corresponding steady-state gains:

G_{f}=-\frac{G_{d}}{G_{t} G_{v} G_{p}}              (15-21)

G_{F}(s)=-\frac{K_{d}}{K_{t} K_{v} K_{p}}           (1)

From the given information,

\begin{aligned}K_{t} &=0.08 \frac{ mA }{ L / min } \\K_{v} &=4 \frac{ gal / min }{ mA }\end{aligned}

Next, calculate K_{p} and K_{d} from the given data. Linear regression gives:

\begin{aligned}K_{p} &=-2.1 \frac{ ppm }{ gal / min } \\K_{d} &=0.235 \frac{ ppm }{ L / min }\end{aligned}

Substitute these gains into (1) to get:

\begin{aligned}&G_{F}(s)=-\frac{0.235 \frac{ ppm }{ L / min }}{\left(0.08 \frac{ mA }{ L / min }\right)\left(4 \frac{ gal / min }{ mA }\right)\left(-2.1 \frac{ ppm }{ gal / min }\right)} \\&G_{F}(s)=0.35\end{aligned}