Question 9.P.17: Illustrate the reinvestment fallacy by supposing that, in Pr......

Illustrate the reinvestment fallacy by supposing that, in Problem 9.15, the revenues from system 2 could be reinvested at 40% in years 3 through 5.

Step-by-Step
The 'Blue Check Mark' means that this solution was answered by an expert.
Learn more on how do we answer questions.

At the end of five years, the net future worth of system 1 is:

FW_1 = -$50 000(F/P, 15%, 5) + $22 000(F/A, 15%, 5)

= -$50 000(2.0114) + $22 000(6.7424) = $47 762.80

and the net future worth of system 2 is (draw a time diagram):

FW_2 = -$75 000(F/P, 15%, 5) + $24 000(F/P, 15%, 1)(F/P, 40%, 3) + $24 000(F/A, 40%, 4)

= -$75 000(2.0114) + $24 000(1.15)(2.7440) + $24 000(7.1040)

= $95 375.40

The effect of the reinvestment is to reverse the conclusion of Problem 9.15: now, system 2 is the better.

Related Answered Questions

Question: 9.P.4

Verified Answer:

\begin{matrix} proposal\ A & (A/P,\ i^*...
Question: 9.6

Verified Answer:

Here, C is the initial investment, A is the annual...
Question: 9.5

Verified Answer:

This is an instance of financial interdependence. ...