Illustrate the reinvestment fallacy by supposing that, in Problem 9.15, the revenues from system 2 could be reinvested at 40% in years 3 through 5.
At the end of five years, the net future worth of system 1 is:
FW_1 = -$50 000(F/P, 15%, 5) + $22 000(F/A, 15%, 5)
= -$50 000(2.0114) + $22 000(6.7424) = $47 762.80
and the net future worth of system 2 is (draw a time diagram):
FW_2 = -$75 000(F/P, 15%, 5) + $24 000(F/P, 15%, 1)(F/P, 40%, 3) + $24 000(F/A, 40%, 4)
= -$75 000(2.0114) + $24 000(1.15)(2.7440) + $24 000(7.1040)
= $95 375.40
The effect of the reinvestment is to reverse the conclusion of Problem 9.15: now, system 2 is the better.