Question 16.7: Determine the support reactions in the three-span continuous...

Determine the support reactions in the three-span continuous beam \mathrm{ABCD} shown in Fig. 16.17(a).

16.17
The blue check mark means that this solution has been answered and checked by an expert. This guarantees that the final answer is accurate.
Learn more on how we answer questions.

It is clear from inspection that the degree of statical indeterminacy of the beam is two. Therefore, if we choose the supports at \mathrm{B} and \mathrm{C} as the releases, the primary structure is that shown in Fig. 16.17(b). We therefore require the vertical displacements, v_{\mathrm{B}, 0} and v_{\mathrm{C}, 0}, at the points \mathrm{B} and \mathrm{C}. These may readily be found using any of the methods previously described (unit load method, moment-area method, Macauley’s method (Section 13.2)) and are

v_{\mathrm{B}, 0}=\frac{8.88}{E I} \quad v_{\mathrm{C}, 0}=\frac{9.08}{E I} \quad(\text { downwards) }

We now require the flexibility coefficients, a_{11}, a_{12}, a_{22} and a_{21}. The coefficients a_{11} and a_{21} are found by placing a unit load at B (point 1) as shown in Fig. 16.17(c) and then determining the displacements at \mathrm{B} and \mathrm{C} (point 2). Similarly, the coefficients a_{22} and a_{12} are found by placing a unit load at \mathrm{C} and calculating the displacements at \mathrm{C} and \mathrm{B}; again, any of the methods listed above may be used. However, from the reciprocal theorem (Section 15.4) a_{12}=a_{21} and from symmetry a_{11}=a_{22}. Therefore it is only necessary to calculate the displacements a_{11} and a_{21} from Fig. 16.17(c). These are

a_{11}=a_{22}=\frac{0.45}{E I} \quad a_{21}=a_{12}=\frac{0.39}{E I} \quad \text { (downwards) }

The total displacements at the support points B and C are zero so that

\begin{aligned}& v_{\mathrm{B}, 0}-a_{11} R_{1}-a_{12} R_{2}=0 & (\text{i})\\& v_{\mathrm{C}, 0}-a_{21} R_{1}-a_{22} R_{2}=0 & (\text{ii})\end{aligned}

or, substituting the calculated values of v_{\mathrm{B}, 0}, a_{11}, etc., in Eqs (i) and (ii), and multiplying through by E I

\begin{aligned} & 8.88-0.45 R_{1}-0.39 R_{2}=0 & (\text{iii})\\ & 9.08-0.39 R_{1}-0.45 R_{2}=0 & (\text{iv}) \end{aligned}

Note that the negative signs in the terms involving R_{1} and R_{2} in Eqs (i) and (ii) are due to the fact that the unit loads were applied in the opposite directions to R_{1} and R_{2}. Solving Eqs (iii) and (iv) we obtain

R_{1}\left(=R_{\mathrm{B}}\right)=8.7 \mathrm{kN} \quad R_{2}\left(=R_{\mathrm{C}}\right)=12.68  \mathrm{kN}

The remaining reactions are determined by considering the statical equilibrium of the beam and are

R_{\mathrm{A}}=1.97 \mathrm{kN} \quad R_{\mathrm{B}}=4.65  \mathrm{kN}

Related Answered Questions

Question: 16.21

Verified Answer:

In this example the frame is unsymmetrical but swa...
Question: 16.18

Verified Answer:

This example differs slightly from Ex. 16.17 in th...
Question: 16.15

Verified Answer:

The beam in Fig. 16.33 is the beam that was solved...