Question 1.220: Let R ⊂ S be a pair of rings such that S is integral over R.......

Let katex is not defined be a pair of rings such that katex is not defined is integral over katex is not defined. If katex is not defined is a prime ideal in katex is not defined, then prove that there exists a prime ideal katex is not defined in katex is not defined such that katex is not defined.

Step-by-Step
The 'Blue Check Mark' means that this solution was answered by an expert.
Learn more on how do we answer questions.

The idea is to analyze the situation locally. Let katex is not defined denote the complement of katex is not defined in katex is not defined. Then katex is not defined is a multiplicative monoid. Notice that katex is not defined is a multiplicative monoid in katex is not defined as well.

By Problem 217 we know that katex is not defined is integral over katex is not defined and also if katex is not defined is a prime ideal in katex is not defined then katex is not defined is integral over katex is not defined. Now, suppose katex is not defined is a maximal ideal in katex is not defined. (The existence of katex is not defined is guaranteed by the Zorn’s lemma.) Since katex is not defined is a field, by Problem 213 we see that katex is not defined is a field, also. In other words, the ideal katex is not defined is maximal in katex is not defined. Since katex is not defined has a unique maximal ideal (generated by katex is not defined ) we have katex is not defined. See Problem 219 .

Similarly, katex is not defined is a prime ideal in katex is not defined and furthermore katex is not defined does not intersect katex is not defined. Therefore, its restriction to katex is not defined, namely katex is not defined does not intersect katex is not defined neither. Thus it is contained in katex is not defined. Combining this with the fact that katex is not defined, we see that katex is not defined.

Related Answered Questions

Question: 1.227

Verified Answer:

katex is not defined Let katex is not defined ...