Question 30.4: A tubular membrane with a diameter of 2 cm and a water perme......

A tubular membrane with a diameter of 2 cm and a water permeability of 250 L/m² -h-atm is being used for UF of cheese whey. The whey proteins have an average diffusivity of 4 × 10^{- 7} cm²/s, and the osmotic pressure in atmospheres is given by Jonsson’s equation^{23} :

π = 4.4 × 10^{- 3}c- 1.7 × 10^{- 6}c² + 7.9 × 10^{- 8}c³

where c is the protein concentration in grams per liter. (a) Calculate the effect of Δp on the flux for a clean membrane if the solution velocity is 1.5 m/s and the protein concentration is 10, 20, or 40 g/L. Assume the gel concentration is 400 g/L and the rejection is 100 percent. (b) If the membrane permeability is reduced fivefold by plugging, what is the effect on the permeate flux?

Question Data is a breakdown of the data given in the question above.

Diameter of the tubular membrane: 2 cm

Water permeability of the membrane: 250 L/m²-h-atm

Whey proteins diffusivity: 4 × 10^(-7) cm²/s

Osmotic pressure equation: π = 4.4 × 10^(-3)c – 1.7 × 10^(-6)c² + 7.9 × 10^(-8)c³

Solution velocity: 1.5 m/s

Protein concentrations: 10 g/L, 20 g/L, 40 g/L

Gel concentration: 400 g/L

Rejection: 100%

Membrane permeability reduction due to plugging: fivefold

The blue check mark means that this solution has been answered and checked by an expert. This guarantees that the final answer is accurate.
Learn more on how we answer questions.
In this problem, we are given the conditions for a bulk solution and we need to calculate various parameters related to membrane filtration.
Step 1:
Calculate the Reynolds number (N_Re) and Sherwood number (N_Se) using the given formulas and values for velocity (V), density (ρ), and viscosity (μ).
Step 2:
Use equation (21.55) to calculate the Sherwood number (N_Sh) using the values of N_Re and N_Se.
Step 3:
Calculate the mass transfer coefficient (k_c) using the formula and the calculated value of N_Sh.
Step 4:
Assume a concentration (c_1) and a velocity (v) and use equation (30.53) to calculate the concentration at the surface of the membrane (c_s).
Step 5:
Calculate the osmotic pressure (π) using the given equation and the calculated value of c_s.
Step 6:
Use equation (30.50) to calculate the pressure drop (Δp) using the given value of Q_m and the calculated value of π.
Step 7:
Repeat steps 4-6 for different values of v to obtain a plot of flux against pressure drop.
Step 8:
Analyze the plot and observe the behavior of the flux at different pressure drops and concentrations.
Step 9:
In part (b), repeat steps 4-6 for a different value of Q_m and observe the effect on flux and pressure drop.
Step 10:
Analyze the results and explain the observations in words.

Final Answer

(a) Assume the bulk solutions have the same density and viscosity as water:

D=2 ~cm \quad \bar{V}=150 ~cm / s \quad \rho=1 ~g / cm ^3 \quad \mu=0.01 ~g / cm – s

N_{ Re }=2 \times 150 \times 1 / 0.01=30,000 \quad N_{ Se }=\frac{0.01}{1 \times 4 \times 10^{-7}}=25,000

From Eq. (21.55),

N_{ Sh }=0.0096 N_{ Re }^{0.913} N_{ S e}^{0.346}    (21.55)

\begin{aligned}N_{ Sh } & =0.0096 \times(30,000)^{0.913} \times(25,000)^{0.346}=3.9 \times 10^3 \\ k_c & =\frac{3.9 \times 10^3\left(4 \times 10^{-7}\right)}{2}=7.8 \times 10^{-4} cm / s\end{aligned}

\text { For } c_1=10~ g / L \text {, pick } v=10^{-3} cm/s or 36 L/m²-h. From Eq. (30.53)

v=k_c \ln \frac{c_s}{c_1}    (30.53)

\begin{aligned}\ln \frac{c_s}{c_1} & =\frac{v}{k_c}=\frac{10^{-3}}{7.8 \times 10^{-4}}=1.282 \\ c_s & =3.60 c_1=36 ~g / L \end{aligned}

At c_s, \pi=4.4 \times 10^{-3} \times 36-1.7 \times 10^{-6}(36)^2+7.9 \times 10^{-8}(36)^3=0.16 atm. For complete rejection of protein \Delta \pi=\pi=0.16:

Q_{ m }=\frac{250~ L }{ m ^2- h – atm } \times \frac{1}{36,000}=6.94 \times 10^{-3}~ cm / s – atm

From Eq. (30.50)

v=Q_{ m }(\Delta p-\Delta \pi) \frac{\mu_{ H _2 O }}{\mu}    (30.50)

\begin{aligned}\Delta p-\Delta \pi & =\frac{10^{-3}}{6.94 \times 10^{-3}}=0.144~ atm \\\Delta p & =0.144+0.16=0.304 ~atm\end{aligned}

Note that over half of the driving force is needed to overcome the osmotic pressure difference caused by concentration polarization.

The maximum flux is obtained from Eq. (30.53) with c_s=400:

v_{\max }=7.8 \times 10^{-4} \ln \frac{400}{10}=2.88 \times 10^{-3} ~cm / s =104~ L / m ^2- h

At this point,

\Delta p-\Delta \pi=\frac{2.88 \times 10^{-3}}{6.94 \times 10^{-3}}=0.41~ atm

For c = 400, π = 6.54 atm,

Δp= 6.54 + 0.41 = 6.95 atm

Similar calculations are made for other values of v from 10^{- 4} to v_{max}, and the flux is plotted against the pressure drop in Fig. 30.29. The predicted flux is constant for Δp > 6.95, and a gel layer of increasing thickness is presumed to form as the pressure increases, but in practice, the flux might decrease slightly because of compression of the gel layer.
The curves for the three concentrations are similar in shape, but the flux is zero until the pressure difference exceeds the osmotic pressure of the solution, and the intercept is more noticeable for the higher concentrations.

\text { (b) If } Q_m=250 / 5=50~ L / m ^2 \text {-h-atm, } v_{\max } is not changed, but a greater Δp is needed for any value of v. For example, at v=10^{-3} ~cm / s \text { and } c=40~ g / L \text {, }

Q_m=50 \times \frac{1}{36,000}=1.39 \times 10^{-3}~ cm / s – atm

\Delta p-\Delta \pi=\frac{10^{-3}}{1.39 \times 10^{-3}}=0.719~ atm

\begin{aligned}\frac{c_s}{c_1} & =3.6 \quad \text { as in part }(a) \\ c_s & =3.6 \times 40=144 \\\pi & =0.834=\Delta \pi \\\Delta p & =0.719+0.834=1.55~ atm\end{aligned}

The dashed line in Fig. 30.29 shows that the largest effect of the lower membrane permeability is a 30 percent reduction in flux at low pressure drops.

30.
Loading more images...

Related Answered Questions