Question 2.3: Consider the spring–damper system shown in Fig. 2.9. This co...

Consider the spring–damper system shown in Fig. 2.9. This combination of elements is useful for absorbing the impulsive interaction with an impinging system, i.e., a kind of shock absorber. As developed here, it is intended that an input force F_i be the forcing function, and the resulting motion, x_1-x_2(or  v_1-v_2), is then to be considered the resulting output. The relationship between input and output is to be modeled mathematically. Qualitatively  speaking, the system responds to the force F_i storing energy in the spring and dissipating energy in the damper until the force is reduced to zero, whereupon the spring gives up its stored energy and the damper continues to dissipate energy until the system returns to its original state. The net result, after the force has been removed, is that energy that has been delivered to the system by the action of the force  F_i has been dissipated by the damper and the system has returned to its original relaxed state.

The object here is to develop a mathematical model relating the output motion to the input force. The use of this mathematical model in solving for the output motion as a function of time is left to a later chapter.

The Blue Check Mark means that this solution has been answered and checked by an expert. This guarantees that the final answer is accurate.
Learn more on how we answer questions.

As an introductory aid in visualizing the action of each member of the system and defining variables, Fig. 2.9 shows diagrams of three different kinds for this system: a cross-sectioned mechanical drawing showing the system in its initial relaxed state with F_i=0[Fig. 2.9(a)], a stylized diagram showing the system in an active, displaced state when the force F_i is acting [Fig. 2.9(b)], and a free-body diagram of the system “broken open” to show the free-body diagram for each member of the system [Fig. 2.9(c)]. Applying Newton’s third law at point (1) yields

F_i=F_k+F_b       (2.18)

For the elemental equations,

F_k=k(x_1-x_2),     (2.19)

F_b=b(v_1-v_2).     (2.20)

Definitions:

V_1\equiv\frac{dx_1}{dt}.        (2.21)

V_2\equiv\frac{dx_2}{dt}.       (2.22)

The system is now described completely by a necessary and sufficient set of five equations containing the five unknown variables x_1,F_k,F_b,v_1 and  v_2 Note: The number of independent describing equations must equal the number of unknown variables before one can proceed to eliminate the unwanted unknown variables.

Combining Eqs. (2.18)–(2.22) to eliminate variables F_k,F_b,v_1and  v_2 yields

b(\frac{dx_1}{dt}-\frac{dx_2}{dt})+k(x_1-x_2)=F_i.        (2.23)

Note that x_2 and dx_2/dt have been left in Eq. (2.23) for the sake of generality to cover the situation in which the right-hand side of the system might be in motion, as it could be in some systems. Because the right-hand side here is rigidly connected to the frame of reference g, these variables are zero, leaving

b\frac{dx_1}{dt}+kx_1=F_i         (2.24)

This first-order differential equation is the desired mathematical model, describing in a very concise way the events described earlier in verbal form. It may be noted, in the context of state variables to be discussed in Chap. 3, that a first-order system such as this requires only one state variable, in this case x_1, for describing its state from instant to instant as time passes.
Given the initial state of the system in Example 2.3 and the nature of F_i as a function of time, it is possible to solve for the response of the system as a function of time. The procedure for doing this is discussed in later chapters.
The steps involved in producing mathematical models of simple mechanical systems are also illustrated in the following additional examples.

Related Answered Questions