Question 6.9: The surface tension modifies the melting point of particles....

The surface tension modifies the melting point of particles. The effect is important effect when the diameter is in the nanometer range. A differential equation has to be written for T_m (r), the melting temperature of particles of radius r. In order to perform this thermodynamical analysis, assume that the pressure p_s inside the particles is defined. At atmospheric pressure p_0 and for infinitely large particles, the melting temperature is noted T_∞. The surface tension is γ_s for a solid particle and γ_l for a liquid one. According to exercise 4.8, the Laplace pressure p_s (r) for a solid nanoparticle and the Laplace pressure p_\ell (r) for a liquid nanoparticle are given by,

p_s (r) = \frac{2\gamma _s}{r}     and    p_\ell (r) = \frac{2\gamma _\ell}{r} .

Determine the temperature difference T_∞ − T_m (r) in terms of the latent heat of melting \ell_{s \ell} = T_∞ (s_\ell− s_s) and the molar volumes ν_s and ν_\ell that are both assumed to be independent of the radius r. Therefore, perform a series expansion in terms of the radius r on the chemical equilibrium condition. This result is known as the Gibbs–Thomson equation. For some materials, a lowering of the melting temperature can be expected, i.e. T_m (r) < T_∞ . This effect has been observed on individual nanoparticles by electron microscopy. It is used to sinter ceramics at low temperatures.

The Blue Check Mark means that this solution has been answered and checked by an expert. This guarantees that the final answer is accurate.
Learn more on how we answer questions.

The chemical equilibrium between an infinitely large solid particle and the liquid is given by,

μ_s (T_∞, p_0) = μ_\ell (T_∞, p_0) .

For a given radius r, this chemical equilibrium relation becomes,

\mu _s \Bigl(T_m ( r) , p_s(r)\Bigr) = \mu _\ell \Bigl(T_m ( r) , p_\ell (r)\Bigr) .

Thus, for a radius r + dr, this relation becomes,

\mu _s \Bigl(T_m ( r+dr) , p_s(r+dr)\Bigr) = \mu _\ell \Bigl(T_m ( r+dr) , p_\ell (r+dr)\Bigr) .

When expanding the pressure and the melting temperature to first-order in terms of the radius r, this result is recast as,

\mu _s \biggl(T_m (r)+ \frac{dT_m}{dr}dr , p_s (r) +\frac{dp_s}{dr}dr \biggr) = \mu _\ell \biggl(T_m (r)+ \frac{dT_m}{dr}dr , p_\ell (r) +\frac{dp_\ell}{dr}dr \biggr) .

Furthermore, when expanding the chemical potential to first-order in terms of the melting temperature and the pressure, we obtain,

\mu _s \Bigl(T_m (r) ,p_s (r)\Bigr) + \frac{\partial \mu _s}{\partial T_m} \frac{dT_m}{dr} dr + \frac{\partial \mu _s }{\partial p_s } \frac{dp_s }{dr} dr= \mu _\ell \Bigl(T_m (r) ,p_\ell (r)\Bigr) + \frac{\partial \mu _\ell }{\partial T_m} \frac{dT_m}{dr} dr + \frac{\partial \mu _\ell }{\partial p_\ell } \frac{dp_\ell }{dr} dr .

The expression for the Laplace pressure implies that,

\frac{dp_s}{dr} = – \frac{2\gamma _s}{r^2}           and      \frac{dp_\ell}{dr} = – \frac{2\gamma _\ell}{r^2}

Thus, the chemical equilibrium condition is reduced to,

\biggl(\frac{\partial \mu _s}{\partial T_m} – \frac{\partial \mu _\ell }{\partial T_m} \biggr) dT_m =2 \biggl(\gamma_s\frac{\partial \mu _s }{\partial p_s }-\gamma _\ell \frac{\partial \mu _\ell }{\partial p_\ell } \biggr) \frac{dr}{r^2} .

The Gibbs free energy differential reads,

dG = −S dT + V dp + μ  dN

which implies that,

\frac{\partial \mu }{\partial T} = \frac{\partial}{\partial T} \Bigl(\frac{\partial G}{\partial N} \Bigr) = \frac{\partial}{\partial N} \Bigl(\frac{\partial G}{\partial T} \Bigr) = – \frac{\partial S }{\partial  N} = – s .

\frac{\partial \mu }{\partial p} = \frac{\partial}{\partial p} \Bigl(\frac{\partial G}{\partial N} \Bigr) = \frac{\partial}{\partial N} \Bigl(\frac{\partial G}{\partial p} \Bigr) =  \frac{\partial V }{\partial  N} = ν .

The differential equation becomes,

(s_\ell − s_s) dT_m = 2 (γ_s ν_s − γ_\ell ν_\ell) \frac{dr }{r^2} .

The integration of this equation from temperature T_∞ and radius r = ∞ to temperature T_m (r) and radius r yields,

(s_\ell − s_s) \Bigl(T_m (r)- T_\infty \Bigr) = -\frac{2}{r} (γ_s ν_s − γ_\ell ν_\ell) .

Since \ell_{s\ell} = T_∞ (s_\ell − s_s),

T_∞ − T_m (r) = \frac{2 T_∞ }{\ell_{s\ell} r} (γ_s ν_s − γ_\ell ν_\ell) .

Thus, if γ_\ell ν_\ell < γ_s ν_s, then T_m (r) < T_∞, which is the case for certain metals.

Related Answered Questions