Question 10.1: The Simple Ideal Rankine Cycle Consider a steam power plant ...

The Simple Ideal Rankine Cycle

Consider a steam power plant operating on the simple ideal Rankine cycle. Steam enters the turbine at 3 MPa and 350°C and is condensed in the condenser at a pressure of 75 kPa. Determine the thermal efficiency of this cycle.

Question Data is a breakdown of the data given in the question above.
  • Steam enters the turbine at a pressure of 3 MPa
  • Steam enters the turbine at a temperature of 350°C
  • Steam is condensed in the condenser at a pressure of 75 kPa
The Blue Check Mark means that this solution has been answered and checked by an expert. This guarantees that the final answer is accurate.
Learn more on how we answer questions.
In this problem, we are analyzing a steam power plant operating on the simple ideal Rankine cycle to determine its thermal efficiency. The Rankine cycle consists of four processes: pump, boiler, turbine, and condenser.
Step 1:
State 1 We are given that the pressure at State 1 is 75 kPa and the steam is in a saturated liquid state. Using the steam tables, we can find the enthalpy (h1) and specific volume (v1) at State 1.
Step 2:
State 2 At State 2, the pressure is 3 MPa and the specific entropy (s2) is equal to the specific entropy at State 1. Since the pump is isentropic, there is no change in entropy during this process. We can calculate the work input to the pump (wpump,in) using the specific volume at State 1 and the pressure difference between State 1 and State 2. The enthalpy at State 2 (h2) can be obtained by adding the work input to the enthalpy at State 1.
Step 3:
State 3 State 3 is characterized by a pressure of 3 MPa and a temperature of 350°C. Using the steam tables, we can find the enthalpy (h3) and specific entropy (s3) at State 3.
Step 4:
State 4 At State 4, the pressure is 75 kPa and the specific entropy (s4) is equal to the specific entropy at State 3. Since the turbine is isentropic, there is no change in entropy during this process. We can calculate the quality (x4) of the steam at State 4 using the specific entropy values. The enthalpy at State 4 (h4) can be calculated using the quality and the enthalpy of the saturated liquid and saturated vapor at the given pressure.
Step 5:
Calculate heat input and heat output We can calculate the heat input (qin) by subtracting the enthalpy at State 2 from the enthalpy at State 3. Similarly, the heat output (qout) can be calculated by subtracting the enthalpy at State 1 from the enthalpy at State 4.
Step 6:
Calculate thermal efficiency The thermal efficiency (ηth) of the cycle can be calculated by subtracting the heat output from the heat input and dividing the result by the heat input. This gives us the fraction of the heat input that is converted to net work.
Step 7:
Calculate net work The net work (wnet) can be calculated by subtracting the work input to the pump from the work output of the turbine. Alternatively, it can be calculated by subtracting the heat output from the heat input.
Step 8:
Compare with Carnot efficiency We can also calculate the thermal efficiency of a Carnot cycle operating between the same temperature limits. The Carnot efficiency (ηth,Carnot) is given by 1 minus the ratio of the minimum temperature to the maximum temperature. In this case, the minimum temperature is the saturation temperature of water at 75 kPa.
Step 9:
Discuss back work ratio The back work ratio (rbw) is the ratio of the work input to the work output. In this power plant, the back work ratio is very low (0.004), indicating that only a small percentage of the turbine work output is required to operate the pump. This is typical of vapor power cycles, which have lower back work ratios compared to gas power cycles.
Step 10:
Compare with Carnot efficiency The difference between the thermal efficiency of the Rankine cycle and the Carnot efficiency is due to the irreversibilities in the Rankine cycle caused by the temperature difference between the steam and the heat source. The Rankine cycle has a lower efficiency because of these irreversibilities.
In summary, the analysis of the steam power plant operating on the Rankine cycle involves determining the enthalpies at various states, calculating the heat input and heat output, and then calculating the thermal efficiency. The back work ratio and the comparison with the Carnot efficiency provide additional insights into the performance of the cycle.

Final Answer

A steam power plant operating on the simple ideal Rankine cycle is considered. The thermal efficiency of the cycle is to be determined.

Assumptions     1 Steady operating conditions exist. 2 Kinetic and potential energy changes are negligible.

Analysis     The schematic of the power plant and the T-s diagram of the cycle are shown in Fig. 10–3. We note that the power plant operates on the ideal Rankine cycle. Therefore, the pump and the turbine are isentropic, there are no pressure drops in the boiler and condenser, and steam leaves the condenser and enters the pump as saturated liquid at the condenser pressure.

First we determine the enthalpies at various points in the cycle, using data from steam tables (Tables A–4, A–5, and A–6):

\text{State 1:}\quad\quad\left.\begin{array}{l}P_{1}=75  \mathrm{kPa} \\\text { Sat. liquid }\end{array}\right\} \begin{array}{l}h_{1}=h_{ f  @  75  \mathrm{kPa}}=384.44  \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg} \\v_{1}=v_{ f  @  75  \mathrm{kPa}}=0.001037  \mathrm{~m}^{3} / \mathrm{kg}\end{array}

 

\begin{aligned}\text{State 2:}\quad\quad P_{2} &= 3  MPa\\s_{2} &= s_{1}\end{aligned}

\begin{aligned}w_{\text {pump,in }} &=v_{1}\left(P_{2}-P_{1}\right)=\left(0.001037  \mathrm{~m}^{3} / \mathrm{kg}\right)[(3000-75)  \mathrm{kPa}]\left(\frac{1 \mathrm{~kJ}}{1  \mathrm{kPa} \cdot \mathrm{m}^{3}}\right) \\&=3.03  \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg} \\h_{2} &=h_{1}+w_{\text {pump,in }}=(384.44+3.03)  \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{kg}=387.47  \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg}\end{aligned}

 

\text{State 3:}\quad\quad\left.\begin{array}{c}P_{3}=3  \mathrm{MPa} \\T_{3}=350{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\end{array}\right\} \begin{array}{l}h_{3}=3116.1  \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg} \\s_{3}=6.7450  \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg} \cdot \mathrm{K}\end{array}

 

\begin{aligned}\text{State 4:}\quad\quad P_{4} &= 75  kPa \quad \text{( sat. mixture )}\\s_{4} &= s_{3}\\x_{4}&=\frac{s_{4}-s_{f}}{s_{f g}}=\frac{6.7450-1.2132}{6.2426}=0.8861 \\h_{4}&=h_{f}+x_{4} h_{f g}=384.44+0.8861(2278.0)=2403.0  \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg}\end{aligned}

Thus,

\begin{array}{l}q_{\text {in }}=h_{3}-h_{2}=(3116.1-387.47)  \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{kg}=2728.6  \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg} \\q_{\text {out }}=h_{4}-h_{1}=(2403.0-384.44)  \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{kg}=2018.6  \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg}\end{array}

and

\eta_{\text {th }}=1-\frac{q_{\text {out }}}{q_{\text {in }}}=1-\frac{2018.6  \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg}}{2728.6  \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg}}=0.260 \text { or } 26.0 \%

The thermal efficiency could also be determined from

\begin{array}{c}w_{\text {turb }, \text { out }}=h_{3}-h_{4}=(3116.1-2403.0)  \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{kg}=713.1  \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg} \\w_{\text {net }}=w_{\text {turb }, \text { out }}-w_{\text {pump,in }}=(713.1-3.03)  \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{kg}=710.1  \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg}\end{array}

or

w_{\text {net }}=q_{\text {in }}-q_{\text {out }}=(2728.6-2018.6)  \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{kg}=710.0  \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg}

and

\eta_{\text {th }}=\frac{w_{\text {net }}}{q_{\text {in }}}=\frac{710.0  \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg}}{2728.6  \mathrm{~kJ} / \mathrm{kg}}=0.260 \text { or } 26.0 \%

That is, this power plant converts 26 percent of the heat it receives in the boiler to net work. An actual power plant operating between the same temperature and pressure limits will have a lower efficiency because of the irreversibilities such as friction.

Discussion     Notice that the back work ratio \left(r_{b w}=w_{\text {in }} / w_{\text {out }}\right) of this power plant is 0.004, and thus only 0.4 percent of the turbine work output is required to operate the pump. Having such low back work ratios is characteristic of vapor power cycles. This is in contrast to the gas power cycles, which typically involve very high back work ratios (about 40 to 80 percent).

It is also interesting to note the thermal efficiency of a Carnot cycle operating between the same temperature limits

\eta_{\text {th,Carnot }}=1-\frac{T_{\min }}{T_{\max }}=1-\frac{(91.76+273)  \mathrm{K}}{(350+273)  \mathrm{K}}=0.415

Here T_{min} is taken as the saturation temperature of water at 75 kPa. The difference between the two efficiencies is due to the large external irreversibility in the Rankine cycle caused by the large temperature difference between steam and the heat source.

10.3

Related Answered Questions