(a)
Ψ(x,t)=ψ(x)e−i(E0+iΓ)t/ℏ=ψ(x)eΓt/ℏe−iE0t/ℏ⟹∣Ψ∣2=∣ψ∣2e2Γt/ℏ.
∫−∞∞∣Ψ(x,t)∣2dx=e2Γt/ℏ∫−∞∞∣ψ∣2dx.
The second term is independent of t, so if the product is to be 1 for all time, the first term (e2Γt/ℏ) must also be constant, and hence Γ = 0. QED.
(b) If ψ satisfies Eq. 2.5
−2mh2dx2d2ψ+Vψ=Eψ (2.5).
then (taking the complex conjugate and noting that V and E are real): −2mh2dx2d2ψ∗+Vψ∗=Eψ∗ , so ψ∗ also satisfies Eq. 2.5. Now, if ψ1 satisfy Eq. 2.5, so too does any linear combination of them (ψ3≡c1ψ1+c2ψ2 ):
−2mh2dx2d2ψ+Vψ=Eψ (2.5).
−2mℏ2dx2d2ψ3+Vψ3=−2mℏ2(c1dx2d2ψ1+c2dx2d2ψ2)+V(c1ψ1+c2ψ2)
=c1[−2mℏ2dx2d2ψ1+Vψ1]+c2[−2mℏ2dx2d2ψ2+Vψ2]
=c1(Eψ1)+c2(Eψ2)=E(c1ψ1+c2ψ2)=Eψ3.
Thus, (ψ+ψ∗) and i(ψ–ψ∗) – both of which are real – satisfy Eq. 2.5. Conclusion: From any complex solution, we can always construct two real solutions (of course, if ψ is already real, the second one will be zero). In particular, since ψ=21[(ψ+ψ∗)−i(i(ψ−ψ∗))] , ψ can be expressed as a linear combination of two real solutions. QED.
(c) If ψ(x) satisfies Eq. 2.5, then, changing variables x → -x and noting that d²/d(-x)² = d² /dx²,
−2mh2dx2d2ψ+Vψ=Eψ (2.5).
−2mℏ2dx2d2ψ(−x)+V(−x)ψ(−x)=Eψ(−x);
so if V (-x) = V (x) then ψ(-x) also satisfies Eq. 2.5. It follows that ψ+(x)≡ψ(x)+ψ(−x) (which is even: ψ+(−x)=ψ+(x)) and ψ−(x)≡ψ(x)–ψ(−x) (which is odd: ψ−(x)=−ψ−(x) ) both satisfy Eq.2.5. But ψ(x)=21(ψ+(x)+ψ−(x)), so any solution can be expressed as a linear combination of even and odd solutions. QED.