Question 2.6.12: A steel bar undergoes cyclic loading such that σmax= 60 kpsi...

A steel bar undergoes cyclic loading such that σmax=60 kpsi and σmin=20 kpsi. For the material , Sut=80 kpsi, Sy=65 kpsi\sigma _{max}= 60 \ kpsi \ and \ \sigma _{min}= −20 \ kpsi. \ For \ the \ material \ , \ S_{ut}= 80 \ kpsi, \ S_y= 65 \ kpsi,

a fully corrected endurance limit of Se=40 kpsi, and f=0.9S_e=40 \ kpsi, \ and \ f = 0.9.
Estimate the number of cycles to a fatigue failure using:
(a) Modified Goodman criterion.
(b) Gerber criterion.

The Blue Check Mark means that this solution has been answered and checked by an expert. This guarantees that the final answer is accurate.
Learn more on how we answer questions.

From the given stresses,
σa=60(20)2=40\sigma _{a} =\frac{60-\left(-20\right) }{2} =40 kpsi

σm=60+(20)2=20\sigma _{m} =\frac{60+\left(-20\right) }{2} =20 kpsi

(a) For the modified Goodman criterion, Eq. (6–46), the fatigue factor of safety based on infinite life is

mod-Goodman σaSe=σmSut=1n\frac{\sigma _a}{S_e} =\frac{\sigma _m}{S_{ut} } =\frac{1}{n}       (6–46)

nf=1σaSe+σmSut =14040+2080=0.8 n_f = \frac{1} {\frac{\sigma _a}{S_e} + \frac{\sigma _m}{S_{ut}} }  = \frac{1}{\frac{40}{40} + \frac{20}{80} } =0.8 

 

This indicates a finite life is predicted. The S-N diagram is only applicable for completely reversed stresses. To estimate the finite life for a fluctuating stress, we will obtain an equivalent completely reversed stress that is expected to be as damaging as the fluctuating stress. A commonly used approach is to assume that since the modified Goodman line represents all stress situations with a constant life of 106 10^6 cycles, other constant-life lines can be generated by passing a line through (sut,0)\left(s_{ut},0 \right) and a fluctuating stress point (σm,σa)\left(\sigma _m,\sigma _a\right) .

 

The point where this line intersects the σaaxis represents a completely reversed stress (since at this point σm=0\sigma _m= 0 ), which predicts the same life as the fluctuating stress.
This completely reversed stress can be obtained by replacing Se withσrevS_e \ with \sigma _{rev} in Eq. (6–46)for the modified Goodman line resulting in

 

σrev=σm1σmSut=4012080=53.3\sigma _{rev}=\frac{\sigma _m}{1-\frac{\sigma _m}{S_{ut}} } =\frac{40}{1-\frac{20}{80} } =53.3 kpsi

 

From the material properties, Eqs. (6–14)to (6–16), p. 285, give

 

a=(fSut)2/Sea={\left(fS_{ut}\right)^2 } / {S_e}      (6–14)

 

b=log(fSut/Se)/3b=- \log \left({fS_{ut}} / {S_e} \right)/3        (6–15)

 

N=(σrev/a)1/bN=\left({\sigma _{rev}}/{a} \right)^{{1}/{b}}(6–16)

 

a=(fSut)2Se=[0.9(80)]240=129.6a=\frac{\left(fS_{ut}\right)^2 }{S_e}=\frac{\left[0.9\left(80\right) \right]^2 }{40} =129.6 kpsi

 

b=13log(fSutSe)=13log[0.9(80)40]=0.0851b=-\frac{1}{3} \log \left(\frac{fS_{ut}}{S_e} \right)=-\frac{1}{3} \log \left[\frac{0.9\left(80\right) }{40} \right] =-0.0851

 

N=(σreva)1/b=(σrev129.6)1/0.0851N=\left(\frac{\sigma _{rev}}{a} \right)^{{1}/{b}}=\left(\frac{\sigma _{rev}}{129.6} \right) ^{{-1}/{0.0851}}   (1)

 

Substituting σrev\sigma _{rev} into Eq. (1) yields

 

N=(53.3129.6)1/0.0851=3.4(104)N=\left(\frac{53.3}{129.6} \right) ^{{-1}/{0.0851}}=3.4\left(10^4\right) cycles

 

(b) For Gerber, similar to part (a), from Eq. (6–47),

Gerber     nσaSe+(nσmSut)2=1\frac{n\sigma _a}{S_e} +\left(\frac{n\sigma _m}{S_{ut}} \right)^2 =1

 

σrev=σa1(σmSut)2=401(2080)2=42.7\sigma _{rev}=\frac{\sigma _a}{1-\left(\frac{\sigma _m}{S_{ut}} \right)^2 } =\frac{40}{1-\left(\frac{20}{80} \right)^2 } =42.7 kpsi

 

Again, from Eq. (1),

 

N=(42.7129.6)1/0.0851=4.6(105)N=\left(\frac{42.7}{129.6} \right)^{{-1}/{0.0851}}=4.6\left(10^5\right) cycles

 

Comparing the answers, we see a large difference in the results.

Again, the modified  Goodman criterion is conservative as compared to Gerber for which the moderate difference in SfS_{f} is then magnified by a logarithmic S, N relationship.

Related Answered Questions