The results of Example Problem 9-1 include the expected bending stress number for both the pinion and the gear as follows:
s_{tP}= 29 700 psi s_{tG} = 23 700 psi
We should consider the number of stress cycles, the reliability, and the safety factor to complete the calculation indicated in Equation (9-20).
\frac{K_R(SF)}{Y_N} s_t\lt s_{at} (9-20)
Stress Cycle Factor, Y_N : From the problem statement
n_p = 1750 rpm, N_p = 20 teeth, and N_G = 70 teeth. Let’s use these data to determine the expected number of cycles of stress that the pinion and gear teeth will experience. The application conforms to common industry practice, calling for a design life of approximately 20 000 h as suggested in Table 9-7. The number of stress cycles for the pinion is
TABLE 9-7 Recommended design life |
Application |
Design life
(h) |
Domestic appliances |
1000-2000 |
Aircraft engines |
1000-4000 |
Automotive |
1500-5000 |
Agricultural equipment |
3000-6000 |
Elevators, industrial fans, multipurpose gearing |
8000-15 000 |
Electric motors, industrial blowers, general
industrial machines |
20 000-30 000 |
Pumps and compressors |
40 000-60 000 |
Critical equipment in continuous 24-h operation |
100 000-200 000 |
Source: Eugene A. Avallone and Theodore Baumeister 111, eds. Marks’ Standard
Handbook for Mechanical Engineers. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1986. |
N_{cP} = (60)(L)(n_p)(q) = (60)(20 000)(1750)(1) = 2.10×10^9 cycles
The gear rotates more slowly because of the speed reduction. Then
n_G = n_P(N_P/N_G) = (1750 \ rpm)(20/70) = 500 rpm
We can now compute the number of stress cycles for each gear tooth:
N_{cG} = (60)(L)(n_G)(q) – (60)(20 000)(500)( 1) = 6.00 ×10^8 cycles
Because both values are above the nominal value of 10^7 cycles, a value of Y_N must be determined from Figure 9-22 for both the pinion and the gear:
Y_{Np} = 0.92 Y_{NG} = 0.96
Reliability Factor, K_R; For the design goal of fewer than one failure in 10 000, Table 9-8 recommends K_R = 1.50
TABLE 9-8 Reliability factor, K_p |
Reliability |
K_R |
0.90, one failure in 10 |
0.85 |
0.99, one failure in 100 |
1 |
0.999. one failure in 1000 |
1.25 |
0.9999, one failure in 10 000 |
1.5 |
Factor of Safety; This is a design decision. Reviewing the discussion of factors throughout Example Problem 9-1 and this problem, we see that virtually all factors typically considered in adjusting stress on the teeth and strength of the material have been taken into account.
Furthermore, when we select a material, it will likely have strength and hardness values somewhat above the minimum acceptable values. Therefore, as a design decision, let’s use SF= 1.00.
Adjusted Value of s_{at}; We can now complete Equation (9-20) and use it for material selection. For the pinion.
\frac{K_R(SF)}{Y_{NP}} s_t=\frac{(1.50)(1.00)}{0.92}(29 700 \ psi) = 48 450 \ psi < s_{at}
For the gear.
\frac{K_R(SF)}{Y_{NG}} s_t=\frac{(1.50)(1.00)}{0.96}(23 700 \ psi) = 37 050 \ psi < s_{at}
Now. referring to Figure 9-10, and deciding to use Grade 1 steel, we find that the required allowable bending stress number for the pinion is greater than permitted for a through hardened steel. But Table 9-3
TABLE 9-3 Allowable stress numbers for case-hardened steel gear materials |
|
Allowable bending
stress number, s_{ac}(ksi) |
Allowable contact
stress number, s_{ac} (ksi) |
Hardness
at surface |
Grade 1 |
Grade 2 |
Grade 3 |
Grade 1 |
Grade 2 |
Grade 3 |
Flame- or induction-hardened: |
|
|
|
50 HRC |
45 |
55 |
|
170 |
190 |
|
54 HRC |
45 |
55 |
|
175 |
195 |
|
Carburized and case-hardened |
|
|
|
55-64 HRC |
55 |
|
|
180 |
|
|
58-64 HRC |
55 |
65 |
75 |
180 |
225 |
275 |
Nitrided, through-hardened steels: |
|
|
|
83.5 HR 15N |
See Figure 9-14. |
150 |
163 |
175 |
84.5 HR 15N |
See Figure 9-14. |
155 |
168 |
180 |
Nitrided. nitralloy 135 M^a |
|
|
87.5 HR 15N |
See Figure 9-15. |
|
|
|
90.0 HR 15N |
See Figure 9-15. |
170 |
183 |
195 |
Nitrided, nitralloy N^a: |
|
|
|
87.5 HR 15N |
See Figure 9-15. |
|
|
|
90.0 HR 15N |
See Figure 9-15. |
172 |
188 |
205 |
Nitrided. 2.5% chrome (no aluminum): |
|
|
|
87.5 HR 15N |
See Figure 9-15. |
155 |
172 |
189 |
90.0 HR 15N |
See Figure 9-15. |
176 |
196 |
216 |
Source: Extracted from AGMA Standard 2001 -C95. Fundamental Rating Factors and Calculation Methods for Involute Spur and Helical Gear Teeth, with the permission of the publisher. American Gear Manufacturers Association, 1500 King Street. Suite 201. Alexandria. VA 22314.
Nitralloy is a proprietary family of steels containing approximately 1 .0% aluminum which enhances the
formation of hard nitrides |
indicates that a carburized, case-hardened steel with a case
hardness of 55 to 64 HRC would be satisfactory, having a value of s_{at} = 55 ksi = 55 000 psi.
Referring to Appendix 5, we see that virtually any of the listed carburized materials could be used. Let’s specify AISI 4320 SOQT 300, having a core tensile strength of 218 ksi, 13% elongation, and a case hardness of 62 HRC.
For the gear. Figure 9-10 indicates that a through-hardened steel with a hardness of 320 HB would be satisfactory. From Appendix 3, let’s specify AISI 4340 OQT 1000 having a hardness of 363 HB, a tensile strength of 171 ksi, and 16% elongation.
Comments
These materials should provide satisfactory .service, considering bending strength. The following section considers the other major failure mode: pitting resistance. It is possible, perhaps likely, that the requirements to meet that condition will be more .severe than for bending.