Question 6.C-S.7: Ned and Larry’s Ice Cream Company Ned and Larry’s Ice Cream ...

Ned and Larry’s Ice Cream Company

Ned and Larry’s Ice Cream Company produces specialty ice cream and frozen yogurt in pint-sized containers. The latest annual performance report praised the firm for its progressive policies but noted that environmental issues like packaging disposal were a concern. In an effort to reduce the effects of consumer disposal of product packaging, the report stated that Ned and Larry’s should consider the following proposals:

Proposal A-Package all ice cream and frozen yogurt in quart containers.

Proposal B-Package all ice cream and frozen yogurt in half-gallon containers.

By packaging the product in containers larger than the current pints, the plasticcoated bleached sulfate board containers will hold more ounces of product per square inch of surface area. The net result is less discarded packaging per ounce of product consumed. Additional advantages to using larger containers include lower packaging costs per ounce and less handling labor per ounce.

Changing to a larger container requires redesign of the packaging and modifications to the filling production line. The existing material-handling equipment can handle the pints and quarts, but additional equipment will be required to handle half-gallons. Any new equipment purchased for proposals A and B has an expected useful life of six years. The total capital investment for each proposal is shown in the accompanying table. The table summarizes the details of these proposals, as well as the current production of pints.

Current (Pints) (A) Quarts (B) Half-Gallons
Capital investment $0 $1,200,000 $1,900,000
Packaging cost per gallon $0.256 $0.225 $0.210
Handling labor cost per gallon $0.128 $0.120 $0.119
Postconsumer landfill contribution 6,500 5,200 4,050
from discarded packaging (yd^{3}/yr)

Because Ned and Larry’s promotes partnering with suppliers, customers, and the community, they wish to include a portion of the cost to society when evaluating these alternatives. They will consider 50 \% of the postconsumer landfill cost as part of the costs for each alternative. They have estimated landfill costs to average \$ 20 per cubic yard nationwide.

Ned and Larry’s uses a MARR of 15% per year and IRR analyses to evaluate capital investments. A study period of six years will be used, at which time the equipment purchased for proposals A and B will have negligible market value. Production will remain constant at 10,625,000 gallons per year. Determine whether Ned and Larry’s should package ice cream and frozen yogurt in pints, quarts, or half-gallons.

The Blue Check Mark means that this solution has been answered and checked by an expert. This guarantees that the final answer is accurate.
Learn more on how we answer questions.

Assuming that Ned and Larry’s is able to sell all ice cream and frozen yogurt produced, we can focus on the differences in costs associated with the three packaging alternatives. Since our recommendation is to be supported by IRR analysis, we must use the incremental analysis procedure.

The first step in the incremental analysis procedure is to rank-order the alternatives by increasing capital investment:

Current(pints) \rightarrow A (quarts) \rightarrow B (half-gallons) .

Now we can compute the incremental difference between producing in quarts (A) instead of pints (current) and determine whether the incremental capital investment is justified.

Δ (A − current)
Δ Capital investment −$1,200,000
Δ Packaging cost savings [$0.031/gal](10,625,000 gal/yr) = $329,375/yr
Δ Handling cost savings [$0.008/gal](10,625,000 gal/yr) = $85,000/yr
Δ Landfill cost savings [1,300 yd^{3}/yr](0.5)($20/yd^{3}) = $13,000/yr

To determine the IRR of the incremental investment, we can find the interest rate at which the PW of the incremental cash flows is zero.

\operatorname{PW}\left(i_{\Delta}^{\prime} \%\right)=0=-\$ 1,200,000+(\$ 329,375+\$ 85,000+\$ 13,000)\left(P / A, i_{\Delta}^{\prime} \%, 6\right) .

By trial and error, i_{\Delta}^{\prime} \%=27.2 \%>\mathrm{MARR}. Thus, the investment required to produce the quart-size containers for ice cream is economically justified. Our decision is currently to produce quart-size containers unless the extra investment required to produce in half-gallon-size containers (B) earns at least the MARR based on projected savings.

Δ (B − A)
Δ Capital investment −$700,000
Δ Packaging cost savings [$0.015/gal](10,625,000 gal/yr) = $159,375/yr
Δ Handling cost savings [$0.001/gal](10,625,000 gal/yr) = $10,625/yr
Δ Landfill cost savings [1,150 yd^{3}/yr](0.5)($20/yd^{3}) = $11,500/yr
\operatorname{PW}\left(i_{\Delta}^{\prime} \%\right)=0=-\$ 700,000+(\$ 159,375+\$ 10,625+\$ 11,500)\left(P / A, i_{\Delta}^{\prime} \%, 6\right)

By trial and error, i_{\Delta}^{\prime} \%=14.3 \%<\mathrm{MARR}. Therefore, the extra investment required to produce in half-gallon-size containers (B) is not justified by the quantified extra savings.

Based on the preceding incremental IRR analysis, the final recommendation for Ned and Larry’s Ice Cream Company is to produce ice cream and frozen yogurt in quart containers (i.e., Proposal A ). The foregoing incremental analysis procedure indicates that this recommendation will yield an i_{\Delta}^{\prime} \%=27.2 \%, which is greater than the MARR of 15 \%. So, by making the recommended change to packaging all ice cream and frozen yogurt in quart containers, not only will Ned and Larry’s be delivering great tasting products that are economically attractive to the company, but also the company will be environmentally conscious as well! A win all around! What flavor would you like?

Related Answered Questions