Question 3.RQ.4: QRS Ltd has three main departments – Casting, Dressing and A...
QRS Ltd has three main departments – Casting, Dressing and Assembly – and has prepared the following production overhead budgets for period 3.
Department Casting Dressing Assembly
Production overheads £225,000 £175,000 £93,000
Expected production hours 7,500 7,000 6,200
During period 3, actual results were as follows:
Department Casting Dressing Assembly
Production overheads £229,317 £182,875 £92,500
Production hours 7,950 7,280 6,696
Requirements
(a) The departmental overhead absorption rates per production hour for period 3 are:
Casting £ \boxed{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }
Dressing £ \boxed{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }
Assembly £ \boxed{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }
(b) (i) The overheads in the Casting department were (tick the correct box and insert the
value of the over-/under-absorption):
under-absorbed \square over-absorbed \square
by £ \boxed{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }
(ii) The overheads in the Dressing department were (tick the correct box and insert the value of the over-/under-absorption):
under-absorbed \square over-absorbed \square
by £ \boxed{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }
(c) The overheads in the Assembly department were over-absorbed. Which of the following factors contributed to the over absorption?
\square the actual overheads incurred were lower than budgeted.
\square the actual production hours were higher than budgeted.
Learn more on how we answer questions.
● A common mistake in part (b) would be to compare the actual overheads with the budgeted overheads instead of with the absorbed overheads when calculating the underor over-absorp
(a) Predetermined departmental overhead absorption rates for period 3 (per production hour).
Casting Dressing Assembly
\frac{£225,000}{7,500} = £30 \frac{£175,000}{7,000} = £25 \frac{£93,000}{6,200} = £15(b) (i) The overheads in the Casting department were over-absorbed by £9,183
(ii) The overheads in the Dressing department were under-absorbed by £875.
Workings :
Casting Dressing
£ £
Overheads absorbed:
£30/hour × 7,950 238,500
£25/hour × 7,280 182,000
Actual overheads (229,317) (182,875)
Over/(under) absorption 9,183 (875)
(c) Both factors would have contributed to the over-absorption. The amount of overhead absorbed increased in line with the production hours, which would have led to over absorption even if the overhead expenditure had remained constant. The fact that the overhead expenditure was below budget would have increased the amount of
over-absorption.