Question 3.RQ.4: QRS Ltd has three main departments – Casting, Dressing and A...

QRS Ltd has three main departments – Casting, Dressing and Assembly – and has prepared the following production overhead budgets for period 3.

Department                                        Casting          Dressing                Assembly
Production overheads                    £225,000        £175,000               £93,000
Expected production hours             7,500               7,000                     6,200

During period 3, actual results were as follows:

Department                               Casting                   Dressing              Assembly
Production overheads             £229,317                 £182,875              £92,500
Production hours                       7,950                        7,280                    6,696

Requirements

(a) The departmental overhead absorption rates per production hour for period 3 are:
Casting              £  \boxed{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }
Dressing           £   \boxed{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }
Assembly          £   \boxed{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }

(b) (i) The overheads in the Casting department were (tick the correct box and insert the
value of the over-/under-absorption):
under-absorbed \square        over-absorbed \square
by £ \boxed{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }

(ii) The overheads in the Dressing department were (tick the correct box and insert the value of the over-/under-absorption):
under-absorbed \square        over-absorbed \square
by £ \boxed{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }

(c) The overheads in the Assembly department were over-absorbed. Which of the following factors contributed to the over absorption?
\square   the actual overheads incurred were lower than budgeted.
\square   the actual production hours were higher than budgeted.

The blue check mark means that this solution has been answered and checked by an expert. This guarantees that the final answer is accurate.
Learn more on how we answer questions.

● A common mistake in part (b) would be to compare the actual overheads with the budgeted overheads instead of with the absorbed overheads when calculating the underor over-absorp

(a) Predetermined departmental overhead absorption rates for period 3 (per production hour).

Casting                       Dressing                        Assembly

\frac{£225,000}{7,500} = £30    \frac{£175,000}{7,000} = £25         \frac{£93,000}{6,200} = £15   

(b) (i) The overheads in the Casting department were over-absorbed by £9,183
(ii) The overheads in the Dressing department were under-absorbed by £875.

Workings :

                                                                     Casting                         Dressing
                                                                         £                                        £
Overheads absorbed:
£30/hour × 7,950                                  238,500
£25/hour × 7,280                                                                            182,000
Actual overheads                                  (229,317)                       (182,875)
Over/(under) absorption                     9,183                                (875)

(c) Both factors would have contributed to the over-absorption. The amount of overhead absorbed increased in line with the production hours, which would have led to over absorption even if the overhead expenditure had remained constant. The fact that the overhead expenditure was below budget would have increased the amount of
over-absorption.

Related Answered Questions