Estimate the maximum sensitive response for the industrial building of Example 17.1 using Newmark–Hall design spectra for an anticipated ground acceleration of 0.308g and for a damping factor of 0.05. Compare the results with the maximum response obtained from time history analysis.
Damping = 5%
(i) NS direction, T = 0.567 s
From chart (see Fig. 17.23), spectra value S_d=6.35~ cm ; S_{p v}=71.12 ~cm / s; S_{p a}=784.35 ~cm / s ^2.
Maximum base shear = m S_{p a}
= 131 697.2 × 7.843
= 1032.9 kN
Column bending moment =\frac{3~ E I S_d}{h^2}
=\frac{3 ~\times ~200~ \times ~10^9~ \times~ 8.6997~ \times ~10^{-5} ~\times ~0.063}{4.2672^2}
= 181.9 Nm
(ii) EW direction
S_d=20~ mm
S_{pv} = 393.7~ mm/s
S_{pa} = 7.843~ mm/s²
ω_{n} = 20~ rad/s
T = 0.313
Maximum base shear = m S_{p a}
= 1032.9 kN
Axial force in rod = \frac{E A~ \cos \theta}{L} S d
=\frac{506.7~ \times~ 10^{-6} ~\times~ 200~ \times~ 10^9 ~\times ~0.8712}{8.73} 0.02
= 202.20 kN
Comparison of the maximum response obtained from time history analysis response spectra and design spectrum analysis is presented in Table 17.4 for NS direction. There is a considerable discrepancy between the results of response spectrum and design spectrum. The former represents the response to a specific earthquake while the latter represents predicted response to any earthquake.
Table 17.4 Comparison of response and design spectral values | |||
Response quantity | Response spectrum |
Design spectrum |
% error |
Relative displacement | 0.045m | 0.063 m | 40 |
Relative velocity | 0.5 m/s | 0.711 | 42.2 |
Max. absolute acceleration | 5.8 m/s² | 7.843 m/s² | 35 |
Base shear | 725 kN | 1032.9 kN | 42.3 |
Bending moment in columns | 128.8 N/m | 189.12 N.m | 46.8 |