For the beam and loading shown, determine the reaction at the fixed support C.
STRATEGY: The beam is statically indeterminate to the second degree. Strategically selecting the reactions at C as redundants, you can use the method of superposition and model the given problem by using a summation of load cases for which deflection formulae are readily available.
MODELING: Assuming the axial force in the beam to be zero, the beam ABC is indeterminate to the second degree, and we choose two reaction components as redundants: the vertical force RC and the couple MC. The deformations caused by the given load P, the force RC and the couple MC are considered separately, as shown in Fig. 1.
ANALYSIS: For each load, the slope and deflection at point C are found by using the table of Beam Deflections and Slopes in Appendix F.
Load P. For this load, portion BC of the beam is straight
(θC)P=(θB)P=−2EIPa2(yC)P=(yB)P+(θB)pb=−3EIPa3−2EIPa2b=−6EIPa2(2a+3b)
Force RC.(θC)R=+2EIRCL2(yC)R=+3EIRCL3
Couple MC(θC)M=+EIMCL(yC)M=+2EIMCL2
Boundary Conditions. At end C, the slope and deflection must be zero:
[x=L,θC=0]:θC=(θC)P+(θC)R+(θC)M
0=−2EIPa2+2EIRCL2+EIMCL (1)
[x=L,yC=0]:yC=(yC)P+(yC)R+(yC)M
0=−6EIPa2(2a+3b)+3EIRCL3+2EIMCL2 (2)
Reaction Components at C. Solve Eqs. (1) and (2) simultaneously:
RC=+L3Pa2(a+3b)RC=L3Pa2(a+3b)↑MC=−L2Pa2bMC=L2Pa2b⤸
The methods of statics are used to determine the reaction at A, shown in Fig. 2.
REFLECT and THINK: Note that an alternate strategy that could have been used in this particular problem is to treat the couple reactions at the ends as redundant. The application of superposition would then have involved a simply supported beam, for which deflection formulae are also readily available.