Question 6.23: In Example 6.22, assume the P-value for formulation C had be......

ISE Principles of Statistics for Engineers and Scientists [987713]

In Example 6.22, assume the P-value for formulation C had been 0.03 instead of 0.005. What conclusion would you reach then?

Step-by-Step

The 'Blue Check Mark' means that this solution was answered by an expert.
Learn more on how do we answer questions.

The Bonferroni adjustment would yield P = (4)(0.03) = 0.12. This is probably not strong enough evidence to conclude that formulation C is in fact effective. Since the original P-value was small, however, it is likely that one would not want to give up on formulation C quite yet.

Related Answered Questions

Question: 6.9

Use the data in Table 6.2 to test the null hypothesis that the proportions of pins that are too thin, OK, or too thick are the same for all the machines. ...

Verified Answer:

We begin by using Equation (6.5) to compute the ex...

Question: 6.7

The article “Geographically Weighted Regression-Based Methods for Merging Satellite and Gauge Precipitation” (L. Chao, K. Zhang, et al., Journal of Hydrology, 2018:275–289) describes a method of measuring precipitation by combining satellite measurements with measurements made on the ground. Errors ...

Verified Answer:

Let 𝜇 denote the mean error. The null and alternat...

Question: 6.11

A new concrete mix is being evaluated. The plan is to sample 100 concrete blocks made with the new mix, compute the sample mean compressive strength X, and then test H0 : 𝜇 ≤ 1350 versus H1 : 𝜇 > 1350, where the units are MPa. It is assumed from previous tests of this sort that the population ...

Verified Answer:

We will reject

H_{0}

if the P-value...

Question: 6.22

Four different coating formulations are tested to see if they reduce the wear on cam gears to a value below 100 𝜇m. The null hypothesis H0 : 𝜇 ≥ 100 𝜇m is tested for each formulation, and the results are Formulation A: P = 0.37 Formulation B: P = 0.41 Formulation C: P = 0.005 Formulation D: ...

Verified Answer:

Four tests were performed, so the Bonferroni adjus...

Question: 6.21

The experiment is repeated. This time, the operator forgets to apply the coatings, so each of the 20 wear measurements is actually made on uncoated gears. Is it likely that one or more of the formulations will appear to reduce wear, in that H0 will be rejected? ...

Verified Answer:

Yes. Example 6.20 shows that the probability is 0....

Question: 6.20

If in fact none of the 20 formulations have any effect on wear, what is the probability that H0 will be rejected for one or more of them? ...

Verified Answer:

We first find the probability that the right concl...

Question: 6.19

Given that H0 was rejected for one of the 20 formulations, is it plausible that this formu-lation actually has no effect on wear? ...

Verified Answer:

Yes. It is plausible that none of the formulations...

Question: 6.18

If only one formulation were tested, and it in fact had no effect on wear, what is the probability that H0 would be rejected, leading to a wrong conclusion? ...

Verified Answer:

If the formulation has no effect on wear, then 𝜇 =...

Question: 6.17

Refer to Example 6.16. Find the sample size needed so that the power will be at least 0.9. ...

Verified Answer:

Question: 6.16

Shipments of coffee beans are checked for moisture content. High moisture content indi-cates possible water contamination, leading to rejection of the shipment. Let 𝜇 represent the mean moisture content (in percent by weight) in a shipment. Five moisture mea-surements will be made on beans chosen ...

Verified Answer: