Refer to Example 14-1, and find the geometric configuration of the coil.
To do this, the NTU and fluid capacity rates must be computed. For the air,
\dot{m} = ρ\dot{Q} = \frac{14.7 (144)}{53.35 (510)} (2000) (60) = 9,336 lbm/hr
and
C_{air} = C_{c} = 0.24 (9336) = 2241 Btu/(hr-F)
For the water,
\dot{q} = C_{w} (t_{wi} – t_{wo}) = C_{air} (t_{ao} – t_{ai})
and
C_{w} = C_{h} = C_{air} \frac{t_{ao} – t_{ai}}{t_{wi} – t_{wo}}
C_{w} = 2241 \frac{100 – 50}{150 – 140} = 11,205 Btu/(hr-F)
Since C_{w} > C_{air}, we have C_{air} = C_{min} = C_{c}, C_{w} = C_{h} = C_{max}, and
\frac{C_{min}}{C_{max}} = \frac{2241}{11,205} = 0.20
The effectiveness ε is given by
ε = \frac{t_{co} – t_{ci}}{t_{hi} – t_{ci}} = \frac{100 – 50}{150 – 50} = 0.50
Assuming that the flow arrangement is crossflow, the NTU is read from Fig. 14-18 at ε = 0.5 and C_{min}/C_{max} = 0.2 as 0.74. Assuming counterflow would yield very near the same value of NTU, then
NTU = \frac{U_{o} A_{o}}{C_{min}}
A_{o} = \frac{0.74 (2241)}{10.2} = 163 ft^{2}
The total volume of the heat exchanger is given by
V = \frac{A_{o}}{α} = \frac{163}{170} = 0.96 ft^{3}
Since a face velocity of 900 ft/min was assumed, the face area is
A_{fr} = \frac{Q}{V_{fr}} = \frac{2000}{900} = 2.22 ft^{2}
and the depth is
L = \frac{V}{A_{fr}} = \frac{0.96}{2.22} = 0.43 ft = 5.18 in.
The number of rows of tubes N_{r} will then be
N_{r} = \frac{L}{\chi_{b}} = \frac{5.18}{1.083} = 4.78
Since N_{r} must be an integer and a multiple of two for the flow arrangement of Fig. 14-18, six rows must be used. This will overdesign the heat exchanger. Another possibility is to use five rows with a two-pass per row circuiting arrangement so that the water connections are on the same end of the coil. This will be considered in Example 14-4 when the lost head on the water side is computed.