Question 3.7: (a) A thick cylinder, inside radius 62.5 mm and outside radi...
(a) A thick cylinder, inside radius 62.5 mm and outside radius 190 mm, forms the pressure vessel of an isostatic compacting press used in the manufacture of ceramic components. Determine, using the Tresca theory of elastic failure, the safety factor on initial yield of the cylinder when an internal working pressure P_{W} of 240 MN/m^{2} is applied.
(b) In view of the relatively low value of the safety factor which is achieved at this working pressure the cylinder is now subjected to an autofrettage pressure P_{A} of 580 MN/m^{2}. Determine the residual stresses produced at the bore of the cylinder when the autofrettage pressure is removed and hence deterniine the new value of the safety factor at the bore when the working pressure P_{W} =240 MN/m^{2} is applied. The yield stress of the cylinder material is σ_{y} = 850 MN/m^{2} and axial stresses may be ignored.
Learn more on how we answer questions.
(a) Plain cylinder – working conditions K = 190/62.5 = 9.24
From eqn(10.5)^{†}
p=p_{0}\sqrt{1-\frac{y^{2} }{b^{2} } } (10.5)
\sigma _{rr}=-P\left[\frac{\left(R_{2}/r \right) ^{2} -1}{K^{2}-1 } \right]=\frac{-240}{8.24} \left[\frac{0.19^{2} }{r^{2} }-1 \right]
=-240 MN/m^{2} at the bore surface (r = 0.0625 mm)
and from eqn . ( 10.6)^{†}
P=\frac{1}{2}\pi bLp_{0} (10.6)
\sigma _{\theta \theta }=-P\left[\frac{\left(R_{2}/r \right) ^{2} +1}{K^{2}-1 } \right]=\frac{240}{8.24} \left[\frac{0.19^{2} }{r^{2} }+1 \right]
=298.3 MN/m^{2} at the bore surface
Thus, assuming axial stress will be the intermediate stress (σ_{2}) value, the critical stress conditions for the cylinder at the internal bore are σ_{1} = 298.3 MN/m^{2} andσ_{3} = -240 MN/m^{2}.
:. Applying the Tresca theory of failure (σ_{1}- σ_{3} = σ_{y}/n))
Safety factor n=\frac{850}{298.3-(-240)} =1.58
(b) Autofrettage conditions
From eqn 3.37 the radius R_{p} of the elastic/plastic interface under autofrettage pressure of 580 MN/m^{2} will be given by:
P_{A}=\frac{\sigma _{y} }{2}\left[\frac{K^{2}-m^{2} }{K^{2} } \right] +\sigma _{y} \log _{e} m (3.37)
580\times 10^{6} =\frac{850\times 10^{6} }{2}\left[\frac{3.04^{2}-m^{2} }{3.04^{2} } \right]+850 \times 10^{6} \log _{e} m
By trial and error:
m | 850\log _{e}m | \frac{850}{2} \left[\frac{3.04^{2}-m^{2} }{3.04^{2} } \right] |
P_{A}
|
1.6 | 399.5 | 307.3 | 706.8 |
1.4 | 286.0 | 334.8 | 620.8 |
1.3 | 223 .0 | 347.3 | 570.3 |
1.33 | 242.4 | 343.6 | 585.6 |
1.325 | 239.2 | 344.2 | 583.4 |
:. to a good approximation m = 1.325 = R_{p}/R_{1}
:. R_{p} =1.325\times 62.5=82.8 mm
:. From eqns 3.38 and 3.39 stresses in the plastic zone are:
\sigma _{r} =\sigma _{y} \left[\log _{e} (\frac{1}{R_{p} } )-\frac{1}{2}(1-\frac{x^{2}_{P} }{x^{2}_{2} } ) \right] (3.38)
\sigma _{H} =\sigma _{y} \left[1+\log _{e} (\frac{r}{R_{p} } )-\frac{1}{2}(1-\frac{x^{2}_{P} }{x^{2}_{2} } ) \right] (3.39)
\sigma _{rr}=850\times 10^{6} \left[\log _{e}\left(\frac{r}{82.8} \right)-\frac{1}{2\times 190^{2} } \left(190^{2} – 82.8^{2} \right) \right]
=850\times 10^{6} \left[\log _{e}\left(r/82.8\right) -0.405\right]
and \sigma _{\theta \theta } =850\times 10^{6}\left[\log _{e}\left(r/82.8\right)+0.595\right]
:. At the bore surface where r = 62.5 mm the stresses due to,autofrettage are:
\sigma _{rr}=-850 MN/m^{2} and \sigma _{\theta \theta } =266.7 MN/m^{2}
Residual stresses are then obtained by elastic unloading of the autofrettage pressure, i.e. by applying \sigma _{rr}= +580 MN/m^{2} at the bore in eqns (10.5) and ( 10.6)^{†}; i.e. by proportions:
p=p_{0}\sqrt{1-\frac{y^{2} }{b^{2} } } (10.5)
P=\frac{1}{2}\pi bLp_{0} (10.6)
\sigma _{rr}=850 MN/m^{2} and \sigma _{\theta \theta } =-298.3\times \frac{580}{240} =-721 MN/m^{2}
Giving residual stresses at the bore of
\sigma ^{′}_{rr} =580-580=0
\sigma ^{′}_{\theta \theta } =266.7-721=-453 MN/m^{2}
Working stresses are then obtained by the addition of elastic loading stresses due to an internal working pressure of 240 MN/m^{2}
i.e. from part (a) \sigma _{rr}=-240 MN/m^{2} and \sigma _{\theta \theta } =298.3 MN/m^{2}
:. final working stresses are:
\sigma _{rr_{w}} =0-240=-240 MN/m^{2}
\sigma _{\theta \theta_{w} } =298.3-454.3=-156 MN/m^{2}
:. New safety factor according to Tresca theory
n=\frac{850}{-156-(-240)} =10.1N.B. It is unlikely that the Tresca theory will give such a high value in practice since the axial working stress (ignored in this calculation) may well become the major principal stress \sigma _{rr} in the working condition and increase the magnitude of the denominator to reduce the resulting value of n.
^{†} E.J. Hearn, Mechanics of Materials I, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997