Question 14.2: Creating the Modified-Goodman Diagram for a Helical Spring P...
Creating the Modified-Goodman Diagram for a Helical Spring
Problem Construct the Goodman line for the spring wire of Example 14-1.
Given The required cycle life is N = 1E6 cycles. Wire is 0.042-in (1.1-mm) dia.
Assumptions The torsional strengths and torsional shear stresses will be used on the Goodman diagram.
Learn more on how we answer questions.
See Figure 14-16.
1 The material’s ultimate tensile strength from Figure 14-3 or equation 14.3 (p. 792), converted to ultimate torsional strength with equation 14.4 (p. 793) using data from Table 14-4 (p. 792) allows one point on the Goodman line to be determined.
S_{u t} \cong A d^b (14.3)
S_{u s} \cong 0.67 S_{u t} (14.4)
S_{u t} \cong 184649(0.042)^{-0.1625}=309071 psi (a)
\begin{aligned} S_{u s} & \cong 0.67 S_{u t} \\ &=0.67(309071)=207078 psi \end{aligned} (b)
This value is plotted as point A on the diagram in Figure 14-16.
2 The S-N diagrams each provide one data point (S_{fw} or S_{ew}, depending on whether for finite or infinite life) on the modified-Goodman line for a material/size combination in pure torsional loading. The fatigue strength S_{fw} for that wire material and condition is taken from the S-N line of Figure 14-15 or calculated from the data in Table 14-9 (p. 813) as
@ N = 1E6 : S_{f w} \cong 0.33(309071)=101993 psi (c)
The x and y intercepts are 0.5S_{fw} = 50 996 psi. This is plotted as point B on the diagram in Figure 14-16. Note that for infinite life the value of S_{ew} from equation 14.13 would be plotted at B instead of this value of S_{fw} for a finite life.
\begin{array}{l} S_{e w^{\prime}} \cong 45.0 kpsi (310 MPa ) \quad \text {for unpeened springs} \\ S_{e w} \cong 67.5 kpsi (465 MPa ) \quad \text {for peened springs} \end{array} (14.13)
3 Note in Figure 14-16 that the wire fatigue strength S_{fw} is plotted at point B (\tau _{a} = \tau _{m} = 0.5 S_{fw}) corresponding to the test conditions of equal mean and alternating stress components (stress ratio R = \tau _{min}/\tau _{max} = 0). Point B is then connected with the ultimate shear strength S_{us} on the mean-stress axis at point A to draw the Goodman line, which is extended to point C.
4 We can now find the value of the fully reversed fatigue strength (R = –1), which is point C on the diagram. This value can be found from the equation for the Goodman line, defined in terms of its two known points, A and B:
\begin{aligned} m &=-\frac{0.5 S_{f w}}{S_{u s}-0.5 S_{f w}} \\ S_{f s} &=-m S_{u s} \\ S_{f s} &=0.5 \frac{S_{f w} S_{u s}}{S_{u s}-0.5 S_{f w}} \\ &=0.5 \frac{101993(207078)}{207078-0.5(101993)}=67658 psi \end{aligned} (d)
5 This use of the Goodman line is conservative for stress ratios R ≥ 0, and its use is justified in this case because springs should always be loaded in the same direction. Helical compression springs tend to have stress ratios between 0 and 0.8, which puts their stress coordinates to the right of the 45° line in the figure, where the Goodman line is more conservative than the Gerber line.
6 Any other combination of mean and alternating stress with a stress ratio R ≥ 0 for this material and number of cycles can now be plotted on this diagram to obtain a safety factor.
Table 14-4 Coefficients and Exponents for Equation 14.3 Source: Reference 1 |
|||||||
ASTM# | Material | Range | Exponent b |
Coefficient A | Correlation Factor | ||
mm | in | MPa | psi | ||||
A227 | Cold drawn | 0.5–16 | 0.020–0.625 | –0.182 2 | 1 753.3 | 141 040 | 0.998 |
A228 | Music wire | 0.3–6 | 0.010–0.250 | –0.1625 | 2 153.5 | 184 649 | 0.9997 |
A229 | Oil tempered | 0.5–16 | 0.020–0.625 | –0.183 3 | 1 831.2 | 146 780 | 0.999 |
A232 | Chrome-v | 0.5–12 | 0.020–0.500 | –0.145 3 | 1 909.9 | 173 128 | 0.998 |
A401 | Chrome-s. | 0.8–11 | 0.031–0.437 | –0.093 4 | 2 059.2 | 220 779 | 0.991 |
Table 14-9 Maximum Torsional Fatigue Strength S_{fw}‘ for Round-Wire Helical Compression Springs in Cyclic Applications (Stress Ratio, R = 0) No Surging, Room Temperature, and Noncorrosive Environment. Source: Ref. 1 |
||||
Percent of Ultimate Tensile Strength | ||||
Fatigue Life (cycles) |
ASTM 228, Austenitic Stainless Steel and Nonferrous |
ASTM A230 and A232 | ||
Unpeened | Peened | Unpeened | Peened | |
10^5 | 36% | 42% | 42% | 49% |
10^6 | 33 | 39 | 40 | 47 |
10^7 | 30 | 36 | 38 | 46 |


