Question 6.3.1: Figure 1 shows an arbitrary infinitesimal triangular prism o...
PROOF OF NONDIRECTIONALITY OF FLUID PRESSURE
Figure 1 shows an arbitrary infinitesimal triangular prism of liquid taken from an arbitrary point in a liquid at rest. The faces of the prism are numbered as follows: face 1 is parallel to the yz plane, face 2 is on the bottom, face 3 is on the top, and face 4 is the triangle at the front of the prism running parallel to the xy plane. Prove that the pressure exerted on the prism by the surrounding liquid is the same in all directions.

Learn more on how we answer questions.
Goal Prove for a liquid at rest that the pressure at an arbitrary point is the same in all directions.
Given The fluid is at rest; the liquid prism is taken from an arbitrary point; the dimensions and angle θ are as shown in Figure 1.
Assume The prism represents a particle since it is infinitesimal and the particle is in equilibrium because it is at rest. The weight of the particle can be ignored. The pressure on each of the faces is different (p_{1} ,p_{2},p_{3},p_{4}) and the pressure on any face acts perpendicular to that face.
Formulate Equations and Solve Because the particle is in equilibrium we know the forces must sum to zero. Since the pressure must be perpendicular to any surface, the only two surfaces with pressure in the x direction are 1 and 3. Based on equilibrium equation (5.3A) we write:
\sum{F_{x} } =0 (5.3A)
\sum{F_{x} } =0\left(\rightarrow + \right) =p_{1} dy dz-p_{3}\left(ds \sin \theta \right)dz
p_{1} dy = p_{3} ds \sin \theta (1)
The only two surfaces with pressure in the y direction are 2 and 3. Based on equilibrium equation (5.3B) we write:
\sum{F_{y} } =0 (5.3B)
\sum{F_{y} }= 0\left(\uparrow + \right) =p_{2} dx dz – p_{3} ds dz\cos \theta
p_{2} dx =p_{3} ds \cos \theta (2)
From Figure 1 we see that
ds \cos \theta = dx (3)
ds \sin \theta = dy (4)
Substituting (4) into (1) and (3) into (2) we get
p_{1} dy = p_{3} dy
p_{2} dx = p_{3} dx
p_{1}= p_{3} = p_{2}
If we were to sum the forces in the z direction the analysis would show that
p_{3} = p_{4}
Combining our results we can conclude thatp_{1}= p_{2} = p_{3}=p_{4}