Question 7.8: NEARLY DEBYE RELAXATION There are some dielectric solids tha...

NEARLY DEBYE RELAXATION    There are some dielectric solids that exhibit nearly Debye relaxation. One example is the La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 La _{0.7} Sr _{0.3} MnO _{3} ceramic whose relaxation peak and Cole–Cole plots are similar to those shown in Figures 7.13b and 7.17,10^{10} especially in the high-frequency range past the resonance peak. La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 La _{0.7} Sr _{0.3} MnO _{3} ’s low frequency (εrdc\varepsilon _{rdc}) and high frequency (εr\varepsilon_{r∞}) dielectric constants are 3.6 and 2.58, respectively, where low and high refer, respectively, to frequencies far below and above the Debye relaxation peak, i.e.,εrdc and εri.e., \varepsilon _{rdc}  \text {and}  \varepsilon _{r∞}. The Debye loss peak occurs at 6 kHz. Calculate εr \varepsilon_{r}^{\prime} and the dielectric loss factor tan δ at 29 kHz.


10^{10} Z. C. Xia et al., J Phys Cond Matter, 13, 4359, 2001. The origin of the dipolar activity in this ceramic is quite complex and involves an electron hopping (jumping) from a Mn3+^{3+} to Mn4+Mn^{4+} ion; we do not need the physical details in the example.

7.13
7.17
The blue check mark means that this solution has been answered and checked by an expert. This guarantees that the final answer is accurate.
Learn more on how we answer questions.

The loss peak occurs when ωo=1/τ,  so that τ=1/ωo=1/(2π6000)=26.5μs \omega_{o}=1 / \tau,  \text { so that } \tau=1 / \omega_{o}=1 /(2 \pi 6000)=26.5 \mu s . We can now calculate the real and imaginary parts of εr\varepsilon _{r} at 29 kHz,

εr=εr+εrdcεr1+(ωτ)2=2.58+3.62.581+[(2π)(29×103)(26.5×106)]2=2.62 \varepsilon_{r}^{\prime}=\varepsilon_{r \infty}+\frac{\varepsilon_{r d c}-\varepsilon_{r \infty}}{1+(\omega \tau)^{2}}=2.58+\frac{3.6-2.58}{1+\left[(2 \pi)\left(29 \times 10^{3}\right)\left(26.5 \times 10^{-6}\right)\right]^{2}}=2.62

εr=(εrdcεr0)(ωτ)1+(ωτ)2=(3.62.58)[(2π)(29×103)(26.5×106)]1+[(2π)(29×103)(26.5×106)]2=0.202 \varepsilon_{r}^{\prime \prime}=\frac{\left(\varepsilon_{r dc }-\varepsilon_{r \infty 0}\right)(\omega \tau)}{1+(\omega \tau)^{2}}=\frac{(3.6-2.58)\left[(2 \pi)\left(29 \times 10^{3}\right)\left(26.5 \times 10^{-6}\right)\right]}{1+\left[(2 \pi)\left(29 \times 10^{3}\right)\left(26.5 \times 10^{-6}\right)\right]^{2}}=0.202

and hence

tanδ=εrεr=0.2022.62=0.077 \tan \delta=\frac{\varepsilon_{r}^{\prime \prime}}{\varepsilon_{r}^{\prime}}=\frac{0.202}{2.62}=0.077

which is close to the experimental value of 0.084.

This example was a special case of nearly Debye relaxation. Debye equations have been modified over the years to account for the broad relaxation peaks that have been observed, particularly in polymers, by writing the complex εr\varepsilon _{r} as

εr=εr+εrdcεr[1+(jωτ)α]β \varepsilon_{r}=\varepsilon_{r \infty}+\frac{\varepsilon_{r dc }-\varepsilon_{r \infty}}{\left[1+(j \omega \tau)^{\alpha}\right]^{\beta}}              [7.36]

where α and β are constants, typically less than unity (setting α = β = 1 generates the Debye equations). Such equations are useful in engineering for predicting εr\varepsilon _{r} at any frequency from a few known values at various frequencies, as highlighted in this simple nearly Debye example. Further, if τ\tau dependence on the temperature TT is known (often τ\tau is thermally activated), then we can predict εr\varepsilon _{r} at any ω\omega and TT.

Related Answered Questions