Question 14.9: Re-do Example 14.6 and locate the performance point using th...
Re-do Example 14.6 and locate the performance point using the EC8-Part 1 method.
Learn more on how we answer questions.
For T = 1 sec, stiffness = 3944 N/m
It is a medium period system having a period T >T_{C} = 0.5 sec
The calculations are same as in Example 14.6. The reduction factor R = 1.87 and the ductility demand is also 1.87.
Step 5: Compute R, S_{a} and S_{d} coordinates for ductility µ = 1.87 using Equation (14.32) and (14.33). This curve will intersect the capacity curve at the same point B as the point of intersection of the vertical line. The target displacement is 0.0933 m, which is same as obtained by the Newmark–Hall method.
S_{\text{d inelastic}} =µ S_{\text{d inelastic}}/R for T < T_{C} (14.32a)
S_{\text{d inelastic}} =S_{\text{d inelastic}} for T > T_{C} (14.32b)
R = (µ − 1)T/T_{C} + 1 for T < T_{C} (14.33a)
R = µ for T >T_{C} (14.33a)
Typical calculations are shown in Table 14.13. The double lines in the table show change in reduction factor R region. The performance point in the A–D response spectra is shown in Figure 14.27
µ = 1 (1 g) | µ = 1 (0.25 g) | µ = 1.87 | T = 1 | T = 0.5 | ||||
S_{a}/g | T | S_{a} | S_{d} (m) | R_{y} | S_{a} | S_{d} | S_{d} (m) | S_{d} (m) |
1.0000 | 0.01 | 2.45 | 0.0000 | 1.0173 | 2.408 | 0.0000 | 0.0621 | 0.0155 |
1.0000 | 0.03 | 2.45 | 0.0001 | 1.0520 | 2.329 | 0.0001 | 0.0621 | 0.0155 |
2.7100 | 0.125 | 6.6395 | 0.0026 | 1.2165 | 5.458 | 0.004 | 0.1684 | 0.0421 |
2.7100 | 0.2 | 6.6395 | 0.0067 | 1.3465 | 4.931 | 0.0094 | 0.1684 | 0.0421 |
2.7100 | 0.3 | 6.6395 | 0.0152 | 1.5197 | 4.369 | 0.0186 | 0.1684 | 0.0421 |
2.7100 | 0.4 | 6.6395 | 0.0269 | 1.6929 | 3.922 | 0.0298 | 0.1684 | 0.0421 |
2.7100 | 0.5 | 6.6395 | 0.0421 | 1.8662 | 3.558 | 0.0422 | 0.1684 | 0.0421 |
2.3300 | 0.6 | 5.7085 | 0.0521 | 1.8662 | 3.059 | 0.0522 | 0.1447 | 0.0362 |
1.8300 | 0.8 | 4.4835 | 0.0728 | 1.8662 | 2.403 | 0.0729 | 0.1137 | 0.0284 |
1.5020 | 1 | 3.6799 | 0.0933 | 1.8662 | 1.972 | 0.0935 | 0.0933 | 0.0233 |
1.0000 | 1.5 | 2.45 | 0.1398 | 1.8662 | 1.313 | 0.1401 | 0.0621 | 0.0155 |
0.9300 | 1.6 | 2.2785 | 0.1479 | 1.8662 | 1.221 | 0.1482 | 0.0578 | 0.0144 |
0.8100 | 1.8 | 1.9845 | 0.163 | 1.8662 | 1.063 | 0.1634 | 0.0503 | 0.0126 |
0.7100 | 2 | 1.7395 | 0.1764 | 1.8662 | 0.932 | 0.1768 | 0.0441 | 0.0110 |
0.5500 | 2.5 | 1.3475 | 0.2135 | 1.8662 | 0.722 | 0.214 | 0.0342 | 0.0085 |
0.4500 | 3 | 1.1025 | 0.2516 | 1.8662 | 0.591 | 0.2521 | 0.0280 | 0.0070 |
It can be seen that the Newmark–Hall spectra required a ductility of 1.87 and target
displacement of 9.33 cm which are the same as required by the EC8-Part 1. The demand curves for a ductility of 1.87 are different in both the methods. Nevertheless, both the demand curves do intersect at the same performance point.
