Question 2.2.7: Showing That a Function Is Not Differentiable at a Point Sh...

Showing That a Function Is Not Differentiable at a Point

Show that f(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}4 & \text { if } x<2 \\2 x & \text { if } x \geq 2\end{array}\right. is not differentiable at x = 2.

The blue check mark means that this solution has been answered and checked by an expert. This guarantees that the final answer is accurate.
Learn more on how we answer questions.

The graph (see Figure 2.18) indicates a sharp corner at x = 2, so you might expect that the derivative does not exist. To verify this, we investigate the
derivative by evaluating one-sided limits. For h > 0, note that (2 + h) > 2 and so, f(2 + h) = 2(2 + h). This gives us

\lim _{h \rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{f(2+h)-f(2)}{h}=\lim _{h \rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{2(2+h)-4}{h}

=\lim _{h \rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{4+2 h-4}{h} Multiply out and cancel.

=\lim _{h \rightarrow 0^{+}} \frac{2 h}{h}=2 Cancel common h’s.

Likewise, if h < 0, (2 + h) < 2 and so, f(2 + h) = 4. Thus, we have

\lim _{h \rightarrow 0^{-}} \frac{f(2+h)-f(2)}{h}=\lim _{h \rightarrow 0^{-}} \frac{4-4}{h}=0

Since the one-sided limits do not agree (0 = 2), f(2) does not exist (i.e., f is not differentiable at x = 2).

6666

Related Answered Questions

Question: 2.10.5

Verified Answer:

First, note that f (x) = sin x is continuous and d...
Question: 2.10.4

Verified Answer:

We first write down (from our experience with deri...
Question: 2.10.2

Verified Answer:

Figure 2.50 makes the result seem reasonable, but ...
Question: 2.9.2

Verified Answer:

Recall from (9.2) that y=\sinh ^{-1} x \qua...
Question: 2.9.1

Verified Answer:

From the chain rule, we have f^{\prime}(x)=...