Your firm faces a potential $100 million loss that it would like to insure. Because of tax benefits and the avoidance of financial distress and issuance costs, each $1 received in the event of a loss is worth $1.50 to the firm. Two policies are available: One pays $55 million and the other pays

Question

Your firm faces a potential $100 million loss that it would like to insure. Because of tax benefits and the avoidance of financial distress and issuance costs, each $1 received in the event of a loss is worth $1.50 to the firm. Two policies are available: One pays $55 million and the other pays $100 million if a loss occurs. The insurance company charges 20% more than the actuarially fair premium to cover administrative expenses. To account for adverse selection, the insurance company estimates a 5% probability of loss for the $55 million policy and a 6% probability of loss for the $100 million policy.

Suppose the beta of the risk is zero and the risk-free rate is 5%. Which policy should the firm choose if its risk of loss is 5%? Which should it choose if its risk of loss is 6%?

Accepted Answer

Plan

The premium for each policy will be based on the expected loss using the insurance company’s estimate of the probability of loss:

$55 million policy: 5% chance of loss $100 million policy: 6% chance of loss

Because it is charging 20% more than the actuarially fair premium, the insurance company will set the premium at 1.20 times the present value of expected losses.

However, the value of the policy to you depends on your estimate of the true probability of loss, which is based on your own assessment and does not depend on the size of the policy. Because each $1 of insured loss benefits your firm by $1.50, you are willing to pay 1.50 times the present value of the expected loss.

Because the beta of the risk is 0, the risk-free rate of 5% is the appropriate discount rate for all calculations.

Execute

The premium charged for each policy is:

[latex]Premium (\$55 million policy) =\frac{5\% imes \$55 million}{1.05} imes 1.20=\$3.14 million[/latex]

[latex]Premium (\$100 million policy) =\frac{6\% imes \$100 million}{1.05} imes 1.20=\$6.86 million[/latex]

If the true risk of a loss is 5%, the NPV of each policy is:

NPV ($55 million policy):

[latex]=-\$3.14 million+\frac{5\% imes \$55 million}{1.05} imes 1.50=\$0.79 million[/latex]

NPV ($100 million policy):

[latex]=-\$6.86 million+\frac{5\% imes \$100 million}{1.05} imes 1.50=\$0.28 million[/latex]

Thus, with a 5% risk, the firm should choose the policy with lower coverage. If the risk of a loss is 6%, the policy with higher coverage is superior:

NPV ($55 million policy):

[latex]=-\$3.14 million+\frac{6\% imes \$55 million}{1.05} imes 1.50=\$1.57 million[/latex]

NPV ($100 million policy):

[latex]=-\$6.86 million+\frac{6\% imes \$100 million}{1.05} imes 1.50=\$1.71 million[/latex]

Evaluate

Note that the insurance company’s concerns regarding adverse selection are justified: Firms that are riskier will choose the higher-coverage policy.

Question 2.3: Your firm faces a potential $100 million loss that it would ...

Related Answered Questions

Bolt Industries is facing increased competition and wants to borrow $10 million in cash to protect against future revenue shortfalls. Currently, long-term AA rates are 10%. Given its credit rating, Bolt can borrow at 10.5%. The company is expecting interest rates to fall over the next few years, ...

Verified Answer:

Verified Answer:

Verified Answer:

Verified Answer:

Consider the following data for Walmart Stores and Target Corporation ($ billions):Compare Walmart’s and Target’s operating margin, net profit margin, P/E ratio, and the ratio of enterprise value to operating income and sales. ...

Verified Answer:

Assess how Global’s ability to use its assets effectively has changed in the last year by computing the change in its return on assets. ...

Verified Answer:

The following table contains information about Walmart (WMT) and Nordstrom (JWN). Compute their respective ROEs and then determine how much Walmart would need to increase its profit margin in order to match Nordstrom’s ROE. ...

Verified Answer:

Assess Global’s ability to meet its interest obligations by calculating interest coverage ratios using both EBIT and EBITDA. ...

Verified Answer:

Compute Global’s accounts payable days, inventory days, and inventory turnover for 2016. ...

Verified Answer:

Suppose Global had an additional $1 million depreciation expense in 2016. If Global’s tax rate on pretax income is 26%, what would be the impact of this expense on Global’s earnings? How would it impact Global’s cash at the end of the year? ...

Verified Answer: