Question 11.5: A [(02/90)2]s graphite–epoxy laminate is cured at 175°C and ...

A [(02/90)2]_s graphite–epoxy laminate is cured at 175°C and then cooled to room temperature (20°C). After cooling the flat laminate is trimmed to in-plane dimensions of 300 × 150 mm and mounted in an assembly that provides type S4 simple supports along all four edges. The x-axis is defined parallel to the 300 mm edge (i.e., a = 0.3 m, b = 0.15 m).

a. Predict the critical buckling load N_{xx}^c and mode for this laminate, if 0 ≤ N_{yy} ≤ 400 kN/m.

b. Predict the critical buckling load N_{yy}^c and mode for this laminate, if 0 ≤ N_{xx} ≤ 400 kN/m.

Use the properties listed for graphite–epoxy in Table 3.1, and assume each ply has a thickness of 0.125 mm.

TABLE 3.1
Typical Properties of Common Unidirectional Composites

Property Glass/ Epoxy Kevlar/ Epoxy Graphite/ Epoxy
E_{11} 55 GPa 100 GPa 170 GPa
(8.0 Msi) (15 Msi) (25 Msi)
E_{22} 16 GPa 6 GPa 10 GPa
(2.3 Msi) (0.90 Msi) (1.5 Msi)
ν_{12} 0.28 0.33 0.3
G_{12} 7.6 GPa 2.1 GPa 13 GPa
(1.1 Msi) (0.30 Msi) (1.9 Msi)
 \sigma _{11}^{fT} 1050 MPa 1380 MPa 1500 MPa
(150 ksi) (200 ksi) (218 ksi)
\sigma _{11}^{fC} 690 MPa 280 MPa 1200 MPa
(100 ksi) (40 ksi) (175 ksi)
\sigma _{22}^{ff} 45 MPa 35 MPa 50 MPa
(5.8 ksi) (2.9 ksi) (7.25 ksi)
\sigma _{22}^{fC} 120 MPa 105 MPa 100 MPa
(16 ksi) (15 ksi) (14.5 ksi)
\tau ^f_{22} 40 MPa 40 MPa 90 MPa
(4.4 ksi) (4.0 ksi) (13.1 ksi)
\alpha _{11} 6.7 μm/m−°C −3.6 μm/m−°C −0.9 μm/m−°C
(3.7 μin./in.\boxtimes  °F) (−2.0 μin./in.−°F) (−0.5 μin./in.−°F)
\alpha _{22} 25 μm/m−°C 58 μm/m−°C 27 μm/m−°C
(14 μin./in.−°F) (32 μin./in.−°F) (15 μin./in.−°F)
\beta _{11} 100 μm/m−%M 175 μm/m−%M 50 μm/m−%M
(100 μin./in.−%M) (175 μin./in.−%M) (50 μin./in.−%M)
\beta _{22} 1200 μm/m−%M 1700 μm/m−%M 1200 μm/m−%M
(1200 μin./in.−%M) (1700 μin./in.−%M) (1200 μin./in.−%M)
Ply 0.125 mm 0.125 mm 0.125 mm
Thickness (0.005 in.) (0.005 in.) (0.005 in.)
The Blue Check Mark means that this solution has been answered and checked by an expert. This guarantees that the final answer is accurate.
Learn more on how we answer questions.

A [(02/90)2]_s graphite–epoxy laminate was also considered in Example Problem 11.1, and numerical values for the [ABD] matrix are listed there.
As before, the 12-ply laminate has a total thickness t = 1.5 mm and aspect ratio R = a/b = 2.0.

a. It is noted that n = 1, since N_{yy} ≥ 0. Equation 11.39

N_{xx}=\frac{-\pi ^2}{(ma)^2}\left[D_{11}m^4+2(D_{12}+2D_{66})(mnR)^2+D_{22}(nR)^4+N_{yy}\left\lgroup\frac{naR}{\pi } \right\rgroup ^2\right]      (11.39)

becomes in this case:

N_{xx}=\frac{-\pi ^2}{0.09m^2}\left[40.1m^4+65.34m^2+172.8+N_{yy}\left\lgroup\frac{0.6}{\pi } \right\rgroup^2 \right]

A plot of the critical buckling load for 0 ≤ N_{yy} ≤ 400 kN/m is presented in Figure 11.9a. As expected, N_{xx}^c is increased as N_{yy} is increased. A change in buckling mode also occurs as N_{yy} is increased. The plate buckles in mode [2,1] over the range 0 ≤ N_{yy} < 35 kN/m, in mode [3,1] over the range 35 kN/m ≤ N_{yy} < 150 kN/m, and in mode [4,1] over the range 150 kN/m ≤ Nyy < 400 kN/m. These buckling modes are illustrated in Figures 11.9b,c,d, respectively.

b. It is noted that m = 1, since N_{xx }≥ 0. Equation 11.41 becomes in this case:

N_{yy}=\frac{-\pi ^2}{0.36n^2}\left[40.1m^4+65.34n^2+172.8(n)^2+N_{xx}\frac{0.09}{\pi^2 } \right]

A plot of the critical buckling load for 0 ≤ N_{xx} ≤ 400 kN/m is presented in Figure 11.10a. As expected, N_{yy}^c is increased as N_{xx} is increased. A change in buckling mode also occurs as N_{xx} is increased. The plate buckles in mode [1,1] over the range 0 ≤ N_{xx} < 72 kN/m, and in mode [1,2] over the range 72 kN/m ≤ N_{xx} < 400 kN/m. These buckling modes are illustrated in Figures 11.10b,c, respectively.

Note that the magnitudes of N_{yy}^c calculated in part (b) are far lower than those calculated for N_{xx}^c in part (a). This pronounced difference is largely due to the stacking sequence involved. For the [(02/90)2]_s laminate under consideration, 8 of 12 plies are 0° plies (i.e., plies with fibers parallel to the x-axis). Hence, the resistance to buckling due to a compressive load N_{xx} is far higher than resistance to buckling due to a compressive N_{yy}.

بدون عنوان
بدون عنوان

Related Answered Questions