Question 10.11: A weir in a horizontal channel is 1 m high and 4 m wide. The...

A weir in a horizontal channel is 1 m high and 4 m wide. The water depth upstream is 1.6 m. Estimate the discharge if the weir is (a) sharp-crested and (b) round-nosed with an unfinished concrete broad crest 1.2 m long. Neglect V_1^2/(2g).

The Blue Check Mark means that this solution has been answered and checked by an expert. This guarantees that the final answer is accurate.
Learn more on how we answer questions.

Part (a)

We are given Y = 1 m and H + Y ≈ 1.6 m, hence H ≈ 0.6 m. Since H \ll b, we assume that the weir is “wide.” For a sharp crest, Eq. (10.56) applies:

Wide sharp-crested weir: C_d \approx 0.564 + 0.0846 \frac{H}{Y}           for             \frac{H}{Y} \leq 2                                  (10.56)

C_d \approx 0.564 + 0.0846 \frac{0.6  m}{1  m} \approx 0.615

Then the discharge is given by the basic correlation, Eq. (10.55):

Q_{weir} = C_db \sqrt{g} \left(H + \frac{V^2_1}{2g}\right)^{3/2} \approx C_db \sqrt{g}H^{3/2}                                      (10.55)

Q = C_db \sqrt{g}H^{3/2} = (0.615)(4  m) \sqrt{(9.81  m/s^2)}(0.6  m)^{3/2} \approx 3.58  m^3/s

We check that H/Y = 0.6 < 2.0 for Eq. (10.56) to be valid. From continuity, V_1 = Q/(by_1) = 3.58/[(4.0)(1.6)] = 0.56 m/s, giving a Reynolds number V_1H/ \nu \approx 3.4  E5.

Part (b)

For a round-nosed broad-crested weir, Eq. (10.57) applies. For an unfinished concrete surface, read ε ≈ 2.4 mm from Table 10.1. Then the displacement thickness is

Round-nosed broad-crested weir: C_d \approx 0.544 \left(1 – \frac{\delta^*/L}{H/L}\right)^{3/2}                                          (10.57)

\frac{\delta^*}{L} \approx 0.001 + 0.2 \sqrt{\epsilon /L} = 0.001 + 0.2 \left(\frac{0.0024  m}{1.2  m}\right)^{1/2} \approx 0.00994
Table 10.1 Experimental Values of Manning’s n Factor^* Average roughness
height ε
n ft mm
Artificial lined channels:
Glass 0.010 ± 0.002 0.0011 0.3
Brass 0.011 ± 0.002 0.0019 0.6
Steel, smooth 0.012 ± 0.002 0.0032 1
Painted 0.014 ± 0.003 0.008 2.4
Riveted 0.015 ± 0.002 0.012 3.7
Cast iron 0.013 ± 0.003 0.0051 1.6
Concrete, finished 0.012 ± 0.002 0.0032 1
Unfinished 0.014 ± 0.002 0.008 2.4
Planed wood 0.012 ± 0.002 0.0032 1
Clay tile 0.014 ± 0.003 0.008 2.4
Brickwork 0.015 ± 0.002 0.012 3.7
Asphalt 0.016 ± 0.003 0.018 5.4
Corrugated metal 0.022 ± 0.005 0.12 37
Rubble masonry 0.025 ± 0.005 0.26 80
Excavated earth channels:
Clean 0.022 ± 0.004 0.12 37
Gravelly 0.025 ± 0.005 0.26 80
Weedy 0.030 ± 0.005 0.8 240
Stony, cobbles 0.035 ± 0.010 1.5 500
Natural channels:
Clean and straight 0.030 ± 0.005 0.8 240
Sluggish, deep pools 0.040 ± 0.010 3 900
Major rivers 0.035 ± 0.010 1.5 500
Floodplains:
Pasture, farmland 0.035 ± 0.010 1.5 500
Light brush 0.05 ± 0.02 6 2000
Heavy brush 0.075 ± 0.025 15 5000
Trees 0.15 ± 0.05 ? ?

^*A more complete list is given in Ref. 2, pp. 110–113.

Then Eq. (10.57) predicts the discharge coefficient:

C_d \approx 0.544 \left(1 – \frac{0.00994}{0.6  m/1.2  m}\right)^{3/2} \approx 0.528

The estimated flow rate is thus

Q = C_db \sqrt{g}H^{3/2} = 0.528(4  m) \sqrt{(9.81  m^2/s)}(0.6 m)^{3/2} \approx 3.07  m^3/s

Check that H/L = 0.5 < 0.7 as required. The approach Reynolds number is V_1H/ \nu \approx 2.9  E5, just barely below the recommended limit in Eq. (10.57).

Since V_1 ≈ 0.5 m/s, V^2_1/(2g) ≈ 0.012 m, so the error in taking total head equal to 0.6 m is about 2 percent. We could correct this for upstream velocity head if desired.

Related Answered Questions