Question 1.7: Capilarity effects are taken into account by considering tha...

Capilarity effects are taken into account by considering that the energy of the system contains contributions that are proportional to the surface area of the interfaces between the different parts of the system. For a drop of wetting liquid on a horizontal surface (Fig. 1.2), where the drop is assumed to have a spherical shape, the internal energy is expressed as U (h,R) = (\gamma _{s\ell }-\gamma _{sg})\pi a^2 +\gamma _{\ell g} A where a=R \sin \theta = \sqrt{2Rh - h^2} is the radius and A = 2πRh is the surface area of the spherical cap of height h at the intersection of the sphere of radius R and the solid substrate. The parameters \gamma _{s\ell },\gamma _{sg},\gamma _{\ell g} characterise the substances and are independent of the drop shape. Show that the contact angle θ is given by,

(\gamma _{s\ell }-\gamma _{sg}) + \gamma _{\ell g} \cos θ = 0 .

by minimising the internal energy U(h, R) under the condition that the volume V (h, R) = \frac{\pi }{3} h^2 (3R − h) = V_0 is constant.

The Blue Check Mark means that this solution has been answered and checked by an expert. This guarantees that the final answer is accurate.
Learn more on how we answer questions.

In order to minimise the internal energy U(h, R), use the Lagrange multipliers method to impose the condition that the volume of the drop is fixed, i.e. V (h, R) = V_0. The function F (h, R, λ) to be minimised is,

F (h, R, λ) = U(h, R) − λ \bigl(V (h, R) − V_0\bigr) = (\gamma _{s\ell } – \gamma _{sg }) π (2 R h − h^2) + \gamma _{\ell g } 2π R h − λ \bigl(\frac{π}{3} h^2(3R − h) – V_0\bigr).

where λ is the Lagrange multiplier. According to this method, the partial derivative of the function F (h, R, λ) with respect to h has to vanish,

\frac{\partial F}{\partial h} =(\gamma _{s\ell }-\gamma _{sg}) 2\pi (R-h) -\gamma _{\ell g} 2\pi R +\lambda \pi (2Rh -h^2) =0.

which yields an expression for the Lagrange multiplier,

\lambda = \biggl(\frac{2}{2Rh – h^2}\biggr)(R-h) (\gamma _{s\ell }-\gamma _{sg})+\biggl(\frac{2}{2Rh-h^2}\biggr) R \gamma _{\ell g}.

The partial derivative of the function F (h, R, λ) with respect to R has to vanish as well,

\frac{\partial F}{\partial R} = (\gamma _{s\ell } – \gamma _{sg})2\pi h + \gamma _{\ell g}2\pi h-\lambda \pi h^2 =0.

which yields another expression for the Lagrange multiplier,

\lambda = \frac{2}{h} (\gamma _{s\ell }-\gamma _{sg}) + \frac{2}{h} \gamma _{\ell g}.

Equating the two expressions for the Lagrange multiplier λ yields,

(R-h)(\gamma _{s\ell }-\gamma _{sg}) + R \gamma _{\ell g} = (2R-h) (\gamma _{s\ell }-\gamma _{sg}) +(2R-h) \gamma _{\ell g}.

which reduces to,

(\gamma _{s\ell }-\gamma _{sg}) + \Bigl(\frac{R-h}{R}\Bigr) \gamma _{\ell g} =0 .

By graphical inspection (Fig. 1.2),

\cos \theta = \frac{R-h}{R}.

Thus, we find that,

(\gamma _{s\ell }-\gamma _{sg}) + \gamma _{\ell g} \cos \theta =0.

Related Answered Questions