Design a flat-belt drive to connect horizontal shafts on 16-ft centers. The velocity ratio is to be 2.25:1. The angular speed of the small driving pulley is 860 rev/min, and the nominal power transmission is to be 60 hp under very light shock.
Design a flat-belt drive to connect horizontal shafts on 16-ft centers. The velocity ratio is to be 2.25:1. The angular speed of the small driving pulley is 860 rev/min, and the nominal power transmission is to be 60 hp under very light shock.
• Function: H_{ nom }=60 hp, 860 rev/min, 2.25:1 ratio, K_{s}=1.15, C=16 ft
• Design factor: n_{d}=1.05
• Initial tension maintenance: catenary
• Belt material: polyamide
• Drive geometry, d, D
• Belt thickness: t
• Belt width: b
d=16 \text { in. } D=2.25 d=2.25(16)=36 in .
Use polyamide A-3 belt; therefore t = 0.13 in and C_{v}=1.
Now there is one design decision remaining to be made, the belt width b.
Table 17–2:
Table 17–2 Properties of Some Flat- and Round-Belt Materials. (Diameter = d, thickness = t, width = w) | ||||||
Material | Specification | Size, in | Minimum Pulley Diameter, in | Allowable Tension per Unit Width at 600 ft/min, lbf/in | Specific Weight, \text { Ibf/in }{ }^{3} | Coefficient of Friction |
Leather | 1 ply | t=\frac{11}{64} | 3 | 30 | 0.035–0.045 | 0.4 |
t=\frac{13}{64} | 3 \frac{1}{2} | 33 | 0.035–0.045 | 0.4 | ||
2 ply | t=\frac{18}{64} | 4 \frac{1}{2} | 41 | 0.035–0.045 | 0.4 | |
t=\frac{20}{64} | 6^{a} | 50 | 0.035–0.045 | 0.4 | ||
t=\frac{23}{64} | 9^{a} | 60 | 0.035–0.045 | 0.4 | ||
\text { Polyamide }^{b} | F -0^{c} | t = 0.03 | 0.6 | 10 | 0.035 | 0.5 |
F -1^{c} | t = 0.05 | 1 | 35 | 0.035 | 0.5 | |
F -2^{c} | t = 0.07 | 2.4 | 60 | 0.051 | 0.5 | |
A -2^{c} | t = 0.11 | 2.4 | 60 | 0.037 | 0.8 | |
A -3^{c} | t = 0.13 | 4.3 | 100 | 0.042 | 0.8 | |
A -4^{c} | t = 0.20 | 9.5 | 175 | 0.039 | 0.8 | |
A -5^{c} | t = 0.25 | 13.5 | 275 | 0.039 | 0.8 | |
\text { Urethane }^{d} | w=0.50 | t = 0.062 | see | 5.2^{e} | 0.038–0.045 | 0.7 |
w=0.75 | t = 0.078 | Table | 9.8^{e} | 0.038–0.045 | 0.7 | |
w=1.25 | t = 0.090 | 17–3 | 18.9^{e} | 0.038–0.045 | 0.7 | |
Round | d=\frac{1}{4} | See | 8.3^{e} | 0.038–0.045 | 0.7 | |
d=\frac{3}{8} | Table | 18.6^{e} | 0.038–0.045 | 0.7 | ||
d=\frac{1}{2} | 17–3 | 33.0^{e} | 0.038–0.045 | 0.7 | ||
d=\frac{3}{4} | 74.3^{e} | 0.038–0.045 | 0.7 |
*Average values of C_{p} for the given ranges were approximated from curves in the Habasit Engineering Manual, Habasit Belting, Inc., Chamblee (Atlanta), Ga.
{ }^{a} Add 2 in to pulley size for belts 8 in wide or more.
\text { bSource: } Habasit Engineering Manual, Habasit Belting, Inc., Chamblee (Atlanta), Ga.
{ }^{c} \text { Friction c } cover of acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber on both sides.
{ }^{d} \text { Source: }: Eagle Belting Co., Des Plaines, Ill.
{ }^{c} At 6% elongation; 12% is maximum allowable value.
\gamma=0.042 lbf / \text { in }^{3} \quad f=0.8 \quad F_{a}=100 lbf / \text { in at } 600 rev / min
Table 17–4:
Table 17–4 Pulley Correction Factor C_{P} for Flat Belts* | ||||||
Material | Small-Pulley Diameter, in | |||||
1.6 to 4 | 4.5 to 8 | 9 to 12.5 | 14, 16 | 18 to 31.5 | Over 31.5 | |
Leather | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
Polyamide, F–0 | 0.95 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
F–1 | 0.70 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
F–2 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
A–2 | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
1A–3 | — | 0.70 | 0.87 | 0.94 | 0.96 | 1.0 |
A–4 | — | — | 0.71 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.92 |
A–5 | — | — | — | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.91 |
*Average values of C_{P} for the given ranges were approximated from curves in the Habasit Engineering Manual, Habasit Belting, Inc., Chamblee (Atlanta), Ga.
C_{p}=0.94
Eq. (17–12):
\left(F_{1}\right)_{a}=b F_{a} C_{p} C_{v} (17–12)
F_{1 a}=b(100) 0.94(1)=94.0 b lbf (1)
H_{d}=H_{ nom } K_{s} n_{d}=60(1.15) 1.05=72.5 hp
T=\frac{63025 H_{d}}{n}=\frac{63025(72.5)}{860}=5310 lbf \cdot \text { in }
Estimate exp(f \phi) for full friction development:
Eq. (17–1):
\begin{array}{l}\theta_{d}=\pi-2 \sin ^{-1} \frac{D-d}{2 C} \\\theta_{D}=\pi+2 \sin ^{-1} \frac{D-d}{2 C}\end{array} (17–1)
\phi=\theta_{d}=\pi-2 \sin ^{-1} \frac{36-16}{2(16) 12}=3.037 rad
\exp (f \phi)=\exp [0.80(3.037)]=11.35
Estimate centrifugal tension F_{c} in terms of belt width b:
w=12 \gamma b t=12(0.042) b(0.13)=0.0655 b lbf / ft
V=\pi d n / 12=\pi(16) 860 / 12=3602 ft / min
Eq. (e):
F_{c}=\frac{w}{g}\left(\frac{V}{60}\right)^{2}=\frac{w}{32.17}\left(\frac{V}{60}\right)^{2} (e)
F_{c}=\frac{w}{g}\left(\frac{V}{60}\right)^{2}=\frac{0.0655 b}{32.17}\left(\frac{3602}{60}\right)^{2}=7.34 b lbf (2)
For design conditions, that is, at H_{d} power level, using Eq. (h) gives
F_{1}-F_{2}=\frac{2 T}{d} (h)
\left(F_{1}\right)_{a}-F_{2}=2 T / d=2(5310) / 16=664 lbf (3)
F_{2}=\left(F_{1}\right)_{a}-\left[\left(F_{1}\right)_{a}-F_{2}\right]=94.0 b-664 lbf (4)
Using Eq. (i) gives
F_{i}=\frac{F_{1}+F_{2}}{2}-F_{c} (i)
F_{i}=\frac{\left(F_{1}\right)_{a}+F_{2}}{2}-F_{c}=\frac{94.0 b+94.0 b-664}{2}-7.34 b=86.7 b-332 lbf (5)
Place friction development at its highest level, using Eq. (17–7):
\frac{F_{1}-m r^{2} \omega^{2}}{F_{2}-m r^{2} \omega^{2}}=\frac{F_{1}-F_{c}}{F_{2}-F_{c}}=\exp (f \phi) (17–7)
f \phi=\ln \frac{\left(F_{1}\right)_{a}-F_{c}}{F_{2}-F_{c}}=\ln \frac{94.0 b-7.34 b}{94.0 b-664-7.34 b}=\ln \frac{86.7 b}{86.7 b-664}
Solving the preceding equation for belt width b at which friction is fully developed gives
b=\frac{664}{86.7} \frac{\exp (f \phi)}{\exp (f \phi)-1}=\frac{664}{86.7} \frac{11.38}{11.38-1}=8.40 \text { in }
A belt width greater than 8.40 in will develop friction less than f = 0.80. The manufacturer’s data indicate that the next available larger width is 10 in.
Use 10-in-wide belt.
It follows that for a 10-in-wide belt
Eq. (2):
F_{c}=7.34(10)=73.4 lbf
Eq. (1):
\left(F_{1}\right)_{a}=94(10)=940 lbf
Eq. (4):
F_{2}=94(10)-664=276 lbf
Eq. (5):
F_{i}=86.7(10)-332=535 lbf
The transmitted power, from Eq. (3), is
H_{t}=\frac{\left[\left(F_{1}\right)_{a}-F_{2}\right] V}{33000}=\frac{664(3602)}{33000}=72.5 hp
and the level of friction development f^{\prime}, from Eq. (17–7) is
f^{\prime}=\frac{1}{\phi} \ln \frac{\left(F_{1}\right)_{a}-F_{c}}{F_{2}-F_{c}}=\frac{1}{3.037} \ln \frac{940-73.4}{276-73.4}=0.479
which is less than f = 0.8, and thus is satisfactory. Had a 9-in belt width been available, the analysis would show \left(F_{1}\right)_{a}=846 lbf , F_{2}=182 lbf , F_{i}=448 lbf, and f^{\prime}=0.63. With a figure of merit available reflecting cost, thicker belts (A-4 or A-5) could be examined to ascertain which of the satisfactory alternatives is best. From Eq. (17–13) the catenary dip is
d i p=\frac{12(C / 12)^{2} w}{8 F_{i}}=\frac{C^{2} w}{96 F_{i}} (17–13)
\operatorname{dip}=\frac{C^{2} w}{96 F_{i}}=\frac{[16(12)]^{2} 0.0655(10)}{96(535)}=0.470 in