(a) In order to determine the actual discharge in the model spillway, the actual discharge equation, Equation 11.158 Q_{a} = \underbrace{\left[\underbrace{\left(\frac{v_{a}}{\sqrt{2g\Delta y } } \right) }_{C_{v}} \underbrace{\left(\frac{A_{a}}{A_{i}} \right) }_{C_{c}} \right] }_{C_{d}} Q_{i} , is applied as follows:
Q_{a} = \underbrace{\left[\underbrace{\left(\frac{v_{a}}{\sqrt{2g\Delta y } } \right) }_{C_{v}} \underbrace{\left(\frac{A_{a}}{A_{i}} \right) }_{C_{c}} \right] }_{C_{d}} Q_{i}
where the C_{D} , or in the case of a spillway, the discharge coefficient, C_{d} , is used to model the flow resistance and is a function of the geometry of the flow-measuring device, L_{i}/L = H/P (and R and W for a small head, H) as illustrated by the Rehbock formula (see Equation 9.303 C_{d} = 0.605 + \frac{1}{305H} + 0.08 \frac{H}{P} ) as follows:
C_{d} = 0.605 + \frac{1}{305 H} + 0.08 \frac{H}{P}
where the head of the weir/spillway, H term is a direct measure of the Reynolds number, R and the Weber number, W, as the effects of viscosity and surface tension are significant only when H is small, as assumed in this example problem. Furthermore, in order to determine the geometry H, and P of the model channel and spillway, the model scale, λ (inverse of the length ratio) is applied as follows:
B_{p}: = 10 ft H_{p}: = 0.95 ft P_{p}: = 3.9 ft \lambda : = 0.25
Guess value: B_{m}: = 1 ft H_{m}: = 1 ft P_{m}: = 1 ft
Given
\lambda = \frac{B_{m}}{B_{p}} \lambda = \frac{H_{m}}{H_{p}} \lambda = \frac{P_{m}}{P_{p}}
\left ( \begin{matrix} B_{m} \\ H_{m} \\ P_{m} \end{matrix} \right ) : = Find (B_{m}, H_{m}, P_{m}) = \left ( \begin{matrix} 2.5 \\ 0.237 \\ 0.975 \end{matrix} \right ) ft
slug: = 1 lb \frac{sec^{2}}{ft} \rho _{m} : = 1.936 \frac{slug}{ft^{3}} \mu _{m} : = 20.5 \times 10^{-6} lb \frac{sec}{ft^{2}}
\sigma _{m} : = 0.00498 \frac{lb}{ft} Q_{im}: = 1.5 \frac{ft^{3}}{sec} A_{3im}: = B_{m} .H_{m} = 0.594 ft^{2}
V_{3im}: = \frac{Q_{im}}{A_{3im}} = 2.526 \frac{ft}{s}
R_{m}: = \frac{\rho _{m} .V_{3im} .H_{m}}{\mu _{m}} = 5.666 \times 10^{4} W_{m}: = \frac{\rho _{m} .V_{3im}^{2} .H_{m}}{\sigma _{m}} = 589.271
C_{dm}: = 0.605 + \frac{1 ft}{305. H_{m}} + 0.08 \frac{H_{m}}{P_{m}} = 0.638 Q_{am}: = C_{dm}. Q_{im} = 0.957 \frac{ft^{3}}{sec}
(b) To determine the ideal discharge in the prototype spillway in order to achieve dynamic similarity between the model and the prototype, the geometry L_{i}/L must remain a constant between the model and prototype as follows:
\left(\frac{L_{i}}{L} \right)_{p} = \left(\frac{L_{i}}{L} \right)_{m}
where the geometry is modeled as follows:
\frac{H_{p}}{P_{p}} = 0.244 \frac{H_{m}}{P_{m}} = 0.244
Furthermore, the R must remain a constant between the model and prototype as follows:
\underbrace{\left[\left(\frac{\rho vL}{\mu } \right)_{p} \right] }_{R_{p}} = \underbrace{\left[\left(\frac{\rho vL}{\mu } \right)_{m} \right] }_{R_{m}}
And, finally, the W must remain a constant between the model and prototype as follows:
\underbrace{\left[\left(\frac{\rho v^{2}L}{\sigma } \right)_{p} \right] }_{W_{p}} = \underbrace{\left[\left(\frac{\rho v^{2}L}{\sigma } \right)_{m} \right] }_{W_{m}}
Because in this example the model fluid is specified to be water, it will become impossible to simultaneously satisfy the dynamic requirements of R and W in the determination of the velocity ratio. Specifically, the “viscosity model” requires that the velocity ratio be defined as follows:
v_{r} = \frac{v_{p}}{v_{m}} = \frac{\left(\frac{\mu }{\rho L} \right)_{p} }{\left(\frac{\mu }{\rho L} \right)_{m} } = \mu _{r} \rho _{r}^{-1} L_{r}^{-1 } = v_{r} L_{r}^{-1}
However, the “surface tension model” requires that the velocity ratio be defined as follows:
v_{r} = \frac{v_{p}}{v_{m}} = \frac{\left(\sqrt{\frac{\sigma }{\rho L}} \right)_{p} }{\left(\sqrt{\frac{\sigma }{\rho L} } \right)_{m} } = \sigma _{r}^{\frac{1}{2} } \rho _{r}^{\frac{-1}{2} } L_{r}^{\frac{-1}{2}}
Thus, equating the two velocity ratios yields the following dynamic requirement:
v_{r} = \frac{\sigma _{r}^{1/2}}{\rho _{r}^{1/2}} L _{r}^{1/2}
However, in fact v_{r} \neq (\sigma _{r}^{1/2}/\rho _{r}^{1/2} ) L _{r}^{1/2}as follows:
\rho _{p} : = 1.936 \frac{slug}{ft^{3}} \mu _{p} : = 20.5 \times 10^{-6} lb \frac{sec}{ft^{2}} \sigma _{p} : = 0.00498 \frac{lb}{ft}
V_{m}: = \frac{\mu _{m}}{\rho _{m}} = 1.059 \times 10^{-5} \frac{ft^{2}}{sec} V_{p}: = \frac{\mu _{p}}{\rho _{p}} = 1.059 \times 10^{-5} \frac{ft^{2}}{sec}
L_{r}: = \frac{1}{\lambda } = 4 \sigma _{r}: = \frac{\sigma _{p}}{\sigma _{m}} = 1 \rho _{r}: = \frac{\rho _{p}}{\rho _{m}} = 1
V_{r}: = \frac{V_{p}}{V_{m}} = 1 \frac{\sigma _{r}^{\frac{1}{2} }}{\rho _{r}^{\frac{1}{2} }} . L _{r}^{\frac{1}{2} } = 2
which does not satisfy the dynamic requirement. The solution to this type of difficult situation is to note that because the flow over a weir/spillway typically involves water, the Reynolds number, R is usually high where the viscous effects are small. Thus, it becomes more important to satisfy the dynamic requirement for W. Although ignoring the dynamic requirement for R will result in a “distorted model” (which can be accommodated for by proper interpretation of the model results), the model will be less distorted and more of a “true model” when the R is large, which reduces the dependence of the drag coefficient, C_{d} on R. In this example R_{m} = 5.666 \times 10^{4} , which is large; thus, not modeling the viscous effects may be insignificant.
A_{3ip}: = B_{p} .H_{p} = 9.5 ft^{2}
Guess value: V_{3ip}: = 1 \frac{ft}{sec} Q_{ip} : = 1 \frac{ft^{3}}{sec} W_{p} : = 500
Given
W_{p}= \frac{\rho _{p} .V_{3ip}^{2} .H_{p}}{\sigma _{p}}
W_{p} = W_{m} Q_{ip} = V_{3ip}. A_{3ip}
\left ( \begin{matrix} V_{3ip} \\ Q_{ip} \\ W_{p} \end{matrix} \right ) : = Find (V_{3ip}, Q_{ip} ,W_{p})
V_{3ip} = 1.263 \frac{ft}{s} Q_{ip} = 12 \frac{ft^{3}}{sec} W_{p} = 589.271
(c) To determine the actual discharge in the prototype spillway in order to achieve dynamic similarity between the model and the prototype, the discharge coefficient, C_{d} must remain a constant between the model and the prototype (which is a direct result of maintaining a constant W, and a constant L_{i}/L between the model and the prototype) as follows:
\underbrace{\left[\frac{Q_{a}}{\sqrt{2g\Delta y} (A_{i}) } \right]_{p} }_{C_{D_{p}} = C_{d_{p}}} = \underbrace{\left[\frac{Q_{a}}{\sqrt{2g\Delta y} (A_{i}) } \right]_{m} }_{C_{D_{m}} = C_{d_{m}}}
Guess value: Q_{ap} : = 1 \frac{ft^{3}}{sec} C_{dp} : = 0.1
Given
C_{dp} = \frac{Q_{ap}}{Q_{ip}}
C_{dp} = C_{dm}
\left ( \begin{matrix} Q_{ap} \\ C_{dp} \end{matrix} \right ) : = Find (Q_{ap},C_{dp})
Q_{ap} = 7.66 \frac{ft^{3}}{sec} C_{dp} = 0.638
Therefore, although the similarity requirements regarding the independent π term, L_{i}/L (H_{p}/P_{p}=H_{m}/P_{m} = 0.244 ), and the independent π term, W (“surface tension model”) ( W_{p} = W_{m} = 589.271 ) are theoretically satisfied, the dependent π term (i.e., the discharge coefficient, C_{d} ) will actually/practically remain a constant between the model and its prototype ( C_{dp} = C_{dm} = 0.638) only if it is practical to maintain/attain the model velocity, flow depth, fluid, scale, and cost. And, thus, application of the actual discharge equation theoretically yields a “true model” only with respect to W. Furthermore, the similarity requirements regarding the independent π term, R (“viscosity model”) ( R_{p} = 1.133 \times 10^{5} \neq R_{m} = 5.666 \times 10^{4} ) are not satisfied and thus application of the actual discharge equation yields a “distorted model” with respect to R as illustrated by this example.
R_{m} = 5.666 \times 10^{4} R_{p} : = \frac{\rho _{p} . V_{3ip}. H_{p}}{\mu _{p}} = 1.133 \times 10^{5}