Inverse problem with two anomalies. Heating and DHW installation We refer again to the installation previously described in Example E.9.1. Two anomalies are now incorporated into the system: one of them is in the RS radiator sys-tem consisting of a 10% decrease in its efficiency, and the other is in the HX heat exchanger, where there is now a 35% decrease in its heat transfer coefficient.
In the same way, as in the previous example, calculations of the exergy of the flows for the operating conditions (real state with faults), free conditions and for the refer-ence state are made. The accumulated values for the heating season are represented in Table E.9.6. However, only the values are shown for the free condition (which will be the reference used) and the real condition with anomalies; since the purpose of this example is to exclusively work the MF and DF theory related to failures.
The results of the analysis of malfunctions and dysfunctions are presented in Table E.9.7. The first column represents the component, with its corresponding num-ber. The second column corresponds to the malfunction, and then the expanded matrix of dysfunctions appears, in which the dysfunctions associated with the consumption of external resources D F_{i0} and those due to other components D F_{i j} are shown. The last column corresponds to the total product variation of the installation.
In view of these results we can make the following comments:
Table E.9.6 Accumulated values of the flows exergy during the heating period.
[GJ] | B1 | B2 | B3 | B4 | B5 | B6 | B7 | B8 | B9 | B10 | B11 | |
FREE | 122.9 | 100.1 | 372.3 | 351.8 | 192.0 | 180.3 | 153.3 | 38.9 | 29.8 | 182.9 | 169.2 | |
REAL | 122.9 | 99.2 | 369.8 | 348.4 | 190.7 | 179.1 | 151.9 | 38.8 | 29.8 | 181.7 | 166.7 | |
B12 | B13 | B14 | B15 | B16 | B17 | B18 | B19 | B20 | B21 | B22 | B23 | B24 |
57.6 | 122.7 | 111.6 | 37.2 | 28.3 | 0.2 | 6.5 | 2.3 | 149.1 | 0.04 | 0.2 | 5.8 | 0.03 |
57.7 | 121.4 | 109.2 | 36.2 | 27.5 | 0.2 | 6.4 | 2.3 | 155.3 | 0.05 | 0.2 | 5.6 | 0.03 |
Table E.9.7 MF and DF values.
MF and DF diagnosis | ||||||||||||||||
M F_{} | DF_0 | [D F] | \Delta P_{S} | |||||||||||||
① | -1214 | -1396 | _ | 557 | -24 | _ | _ | 1255 | _ | -486 | _ | 6617 | -34 | -21 | _ | _ |
② | -450 | -9 | _ | _ | -80 | _ | _ | -48 | _ | 52 | _ | 480 | 104 | _ | _ | _ |
③ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ |
④ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ |
⑤ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ |
⑥ | 206 | -12 | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | -10 | _ | _ | _ |
⑦ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ |
⑧ | -136 | -14 | _ | _ | 87 | _ | _ | 32 | _ | -23 | _ | -15 | -25 | _ | _ | _ |
⑨ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ |
⑩ | 1093 | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ |
⑪ | -40 | -6 | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ |
⑫ | -1 | -15 | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | -129 |
⑬ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ | _ |
⓪ | ① | ② | ③ | ④ | ⑤ | ⑥ | ⑦ | ⑧ | ⑨ | ⑩ | ⑪ | ⑫ | ⑬ |