Question 6.22: Estimate the −3-dB bandwidth of a resistively-degenerated co...

Estimate the −3-dB bandwidth of a resistively-degenerated common-source stage. Assume λ = γ = 0.

The blue check mark means that this solution has been answered and checked by an expert. This guarantees that the final answer is accurate.
Learn more on how we answer questions.

Shown in Fig. 6.53(a), the small-signal model is of third order,^8 providing little intuition. The zero-value time constant method can give a rough estimate of the circuit’s bandwidth, thereby revealing the contribution of each capacitor.

We begin with the time constant associated with C_{GS} and set C_{G D }  and  C_L to zero. As depicted in Fig. 6.53(b), the resistance seen by C_{GS}  is  V_X /I_X . We denote this resistance by R_{CGS}. Since V_1 = V_X and the current flowing through R_S is equal to g_m V_1 − I_X = g_m V_X − I_X , we write a KVL as follows:

I_X R_G = V_X + (g_m V_X − I_X )R_S                                          (6.123)

obtaining

R_{CGS} =\frac{ R_G + R_S} {1 + g_m R_S}                                        (6.124)

For the resistance seen by C_{G D}, we have from Example 6.21

R_{CGD} = R_D +\left(\frac{ g_m R_D}{1 + g_m R_S}+ 1\right)R_G                                                                    (6.125)

Finally, the resistance seen by C_L is simply equal to R_D. It follows that the −3-dB bandwidth is given by

ω^{−1}_{−3d B} = \frac{R_G + R_S}{1 + g_m R_S}C_{GS} +\left[R_D +\left(\frac{g_m R_D}{1 + g_m R_S}+ 1\right) R_G \right] C_{G D} + R_DC_L                                                   (6.126)

With no degeneration, this result reduces to Eq. (6.35). With a finite RS, the effect of C_{GS}  and  R_G is reduced by a factor of 1 + g_m R_S, albeit at the cost of voltage gain.

ω_{p1} = \frac{1}{R_S(1 + g_m R_D)C_{G D} + R_SC_{GS} + R_D(C_{G D} + C_{DB})}                                        (6.35)

^8 This can be seen by observing that it is possible to impose three independent initial conditions across the three capacitors
without violating KVL.

6.53

Related Answered Questions

Question: 6.23

Verified Answer:

We draw the small-signal circuit as shown in Fig. ...
Question: 6.20

Verified Answer:

Since we have already obtained the transfer functi...
Question: 6.19

Verified Answer:

We first consider the circuit without C_F[/...
Question: 6.18

Verified Answer:

No, it does not. Equation (6.100) suggests that th...
Question: 6.14

Verified Answer:

Yes, we can. Called an “active inductor,” such a s...
Question: 6.13

Verified Answer:

Let us first identify all of the capacitances in t...