Holooly Plus Logo

Question 4.2.4: Derive the refraction law and reflection coefficients at the......

Derive the refraction law and reflection coefficients at the interface between two perfecly conducting media of different density, for both shear and compressional Alfven waves, as shown in Figure 4.4.

FIGURE 4.4
Step-by-Step
The 'Blue Check Mark' means that this solution was answered by an expert.
Learn more on how do we answer questions.

The refraction law is determined by the two following requirements: the frequency of the refracted wave (wave 2) is equal to that of the incident wave (wave 1), and the x-components of the wave-vectors, \vec{k}_{1} and \vec{k}_{2}, are also equal to each other. Thus, in the case of a shear Alfven wave, one gets: ω_{1} = k_{1z}V_{A1} = ω_{2} = k_{2z}V_{A2}; k_{1x} = k_{1} \sin θ_{1} = k_{2x} = k_{2} \sin θ_{2}. Since V_{A} ∝ ρ^{−1/2}, it follows from the first of these equations that k_{2} \cos θ_{2} = k_{1} \cos θ_{1}(ρ_{2} ρ_{1})^{1/2}, which together with the second equation yield

(ρ_{2})^{1/2} \tan θ_{2} = (ρ_{1})^{1/2} \tan θ_{1}

For a compressional Alfven wave with the dispersion relation ω = kV_{A}, the above requirements result in

(ρ_{2})^{1/2} \sin θ_{2} = (ρ_{1})^{1/2} \sin θ_{1},

which looks like the standard Snell’s law, with the refractive index of a medium being proportional to a square root of its density. Hence, there is no refracted wave if ρ_{2} < ρ_{1} and the angle of incidence exceeds θ_{r} = \sin^{−1} (ρ_{2}/ρ_{1})^{1/2}, the angle of total reflection.

In order to obtain reflection coefficients of waves one should consider the boundary conditions for the magnetic and electric fields at the interface: the continuity of the tangential components of \vec{B} and \vec{E} . In the case of a shear Alfven wave these are b_{y} and

E_{x} = − \frac{1}{c}Bv_{y}= \frac{k_{z}B^{2}}{4πcρω} b_{y}

(see Problem 4.2.1). In the upper fluid of density ρ_{1} there are two waves, the incident one (wave 1) and the reflected one (wave 3), with the amplitudes of b_{y} equal to b_{1} and b_{3} and k_{3z} = −k_{1z}. In the lower fluid of density ρ_{2} there is only the refracted wave 2. Thus, the above-stated boundary conditions imply:

b_{1} + b_{3} = b_{2}, \frac{k_{1z}}{ωρ_{1}} (b_{1} − b_{3}) = \frac{(b_{1} − b_{3})}{ρ_{1}V_{A1}} = \frac{k_{2z}}{ωρ_{2}} b_{2} = \frac{b_{2}}{ρ_{2}V_{A2}}        (4.26)

Then, by taking into account that V_{A2}/V_{A1} = (ρ_{1}/ρ_{2})^{1/2}, it follows from (4.26) that the reflection coefficient

R = \left( \frac{b_{3}}{b_{1}}\right)^{2} = \left[ \frac{1 − (ρ_{2}/ρ_{1})^{1/2}}{1 + (ρ_{2}/ρ_{1})^{1/2}}\right]^{2}

Note that this reflection coefficient does not depend on the angle of incidence.

Similarly, in the case of a compressional Alfven wave, one should require the continuity of b_{x}, b_{z} and E_{y} = −Bv_{x}/c. Thus, if v_{1,2,3} are velocity amplitudes of each of the three waves shown in Figure 4.4, the above requirements yield (with the help of equations (4.22-4.23)):

v_{z} = 0, v_{y} = − \frac{k_{z}B}{4πρω}b_{y}, v_{x} = \frac{B}{4πρω} (k_{x}b_{z} − k_{z}b_{x})        (4.22)

b_{x} = − \frac{k_{z}B}{ω} v_{x}, b_{y} = − \frac{k_{z}B}{ω} v_{y}, b_{z} = \frac{k_{x}B}{ω} v_{x}      (4.23)

v_{1} + v_{3} = v_{2}, k_{1z}(v_{1} − v_{3}) = k_{2z}v_{2}

(note that the continuity of b_{z} is ensured by the first of the above relations, because all three waves share the same ω and k_{x}). By using the dispersion law (4.25), one gets then the following reflection coefficient:

ω = kV_{A}        (4.25)

R = \left(\frac{v_{3}}{v_{1}} \right)^{2} = \left(\frac{1 − δ}{1 + δ} \right)^{2} , δ = \frac{(ρ_{1}/ρ_{2})^{1/2} \cos θ_{1}}{[1 − (ρ_{1}/ρ_{2}) \sin^{2} θ_{1}]^{1/2}} , θ_{1} < θ_{r}.

Related Answered Questions

Question: 4.3.6

Verified Answer:

Consider a planar magnetic field invariant along t...
Question: 4.2.1

Verified Answer:

For a small amplitude wave, the linearized equatio...