Holooly Plus Logo

Question 12.8: In the early phase of design, two possibilities for the diff......

In the early phase of design, two possibilities for the diffuser of a centrifugal compressor, namely, vaned and vaneless diffusers, are considered. The diffuser has an inlet radius of 0.42 and the flow has inlet Mach number of 0.9 and at an angle of 68° with respect to the radial direction.

1. First, a vaned diffuser is selected, it is required to calculate the Mach number at a diffuser; outlet if the outlet radius of the vanes is 0.525 m, their axial width is constant. Considering an isentropic flow with a pressure coefficient,

c_{\text{pd}}=\frac{p_3-p_2}{p_{02}-p_2} =0.65

what would be the outlet blade angle?
2. If a vaneless diffuser is replaced the vaned diffuser, then what would be the outlet radius and flow outlet angle if the outlet Mach number is maintained the same as for a vaned diffuser?
3. If the flow in the vaned diffuser is no longer isentropic but a drop in stagnation pressure of 10% is encountered, and the same value of c_{\text{pd}} = 0.65 is maintained, then determine the required exit blade angle.
(Assume as a first approximation that the vane and flow angles are the same.)

12.35
Step-by-Step
The 'Blue Check Mark' means that this solution was answered by an expert.
Learn more on how do we answer questions.

Figure 12.35 illustrates a vaned diffuser.
1. Isentropic vaned diffuser: Since

c_{\text{pd}}=\frac{P_3-P_2}{P_{02}-P_2} =\frac{(P_3/P_2)-1}{(P_{02}/P_2)-1} =0.65 \\ \frac{P_3}{P_2} =1+0.65\left[\left(\frac{P_{02}}{P_2} \right)-1 \right] =1+0.65\left[\left(1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^2 \right)^{\gamma/\gamma-1}-1 \right] =1.449

Since

P_{03}=P_{02}, \quad \frac{P_3}{P_2} =\frac{P_3}{P_{03}} \frac{P_{02}}{P_2} =\frac{(1+((\gamma-1)/2)M_2^2)^{\gamma/(\gamma-1)}}{(1+((\gamma-1)/2)M_3^2)^{\gamma/(\gamma-1)}} =\left(\frac{1.162}{1+0.2M_3^2} \right) ^{3.5}

Or (1.449)^{1/3.5}=1.162/1+0.2M_3^2 \text{ or }1+0.2M^2_3=1.162/1.112=1.044964.
The outlet Mach number is M_3 = 0.474.
Since the flow is isentropic in the vaned diffuser, that is, T_{03}=T_{02} \text{ and }P_{03}=P_{02}

\frac{P_3}{P_2} =\frac{\rho_3}{\rho_2} \frac{T_3}{T_2} =\frac{\rho_3}{\rho_2} \frac{(T_3/T_{03})}{(T_2/T_{02})} =\frac{\rho_3}{\rho_2} \frac{1+((\gamma-1)/2)M_2^2}{1+((\gamma-1)/2)M_3^2} \\ \therefore 1.449=\frac{\rho_3}{\rho_2} \frac{1.162}{1.04496} \\ \frac{\rho_3}{\rho_2} = 1.303

From the continuity equation

\rho_2c_{\text{r2}}(\pi \ d_2 \ b_2)=\rho_3 c_{\text{r3}}(\pi \ d_3 \ b_3)

With b_2=b_3,

\frac{C_3}{C_2} =\frac{\rho_2 \ d_2}{\rho_3 \ d_3} \quad \quad \quad (1)

From the conservation of angular momentum in the vaned diffuser

r_2 \ C_{\text{u2}}=r_3 \ C_{\text{u3}}, \quad \text{thus}\frac{C_{\text{u3}}}{C_{\text{u2}}} =\frac{r_2}{r_3} =\frac{d_2}{d_3} \quad \quad \quad (2)

From Equations 1 and 2

\frac{C_{\text{u3}}/C_{\text{r3}}}{C_{\text{u2}}/C_{\text{r2}}} =\frac{\rho_3}{\rho_2}

or

\frac{\tan \alpha_3}{\tan \alpha_2} =\frac{\rho_3}{\rho_2} =1.303 \\ \tan \alpha_3=1.303 \ \tan \alpha_2=1.303 \times 2.4751 \\ \alpha_3=72.766^\circ

2. Vaneless diffuser: The following data are also assumed for the vaneless diffuser

M_2=0.9, \quad r_2=0.42 \text{ m}, \quad M_3=0.474, \quad \text{ and } \quad \alpha_2=68^\circ.

The flow is compressible and isentropic, and from Equation 12.30

\tan \alpha_3=\tan \alpha_2\left[\frac{1+((\gamma-1)/2)M_2^2}{1+((\gamma-1)/2)M_3^2} \right] ^{1/\gamma-1} \quad \quad \quad (12.30) \\ \alpha_3=72.7833

Also from Equation 12.31

r_3=r_2\frac{\sin \alpha_2}{\sin \alpha_3 } \frac{M_2}{M_3} \left[\frac{1+((\gamma-1)/2)M_3^2}{1+((\gamma-1)/2)M_2^2} \right] ^{1/2} \quad \quad \quad (12.31) \\ r_3=0.744 \text{ m}

It is clear from cases (1) and (2) that the outlet diameter of the vaneless diffuser (0.744 m) is much greater than the outlet diameter of the vaned diffuser (0.525 m); thus, vaneless diffuser enlarges the outer diameter of the compressor, which in turn increases the frontal area of aero engines and increases the drag force.
If P_{03}=0.9P_{02} \&T_{03}=T_{02}\text{ and }P_3/P_2=1.449

\therefore\frac{P_{02}/P_2}{P_{03}/P_3} =\left(\frac{1+((\gamma-1)/2)M_2^2}{1+((\gamma-1)/2)M_3^2} \right) ^{\gamma/(\gamma-1)}=\left(\frac{1.162}{1+0.2M_3^2} \right) ^{3.5}

But

\frac{P_{02}/P_2}{P_{03}/P_3} =\frac{P_{02}}{P_{03}} \frac{P_3}{P_2} =\frac{1.449}{0.9}=1.61

Then M_3 =0.2805

\frac{P_3}{P_2} =\frac{\rho_3}{\rho_2} \frac{T_3}{T_2} =\frac{\rho_3}{\rho_2} \frac{(T_3/T_{03})}{(T_2/T_{02})} =\frac{\rho_3}{\rho_2} \frac{1+((\gamma-1)/2)M_2^2}{1+((\gamma-1)/2)M_3^2} =\frac{\rho_3}{\rho_2} \frac{1.0157}{1.162} =\frac{\rho_3}{\rho_2} (0.87413) \\ \frac{\rho_3}{\rho_2} =\frac{1.449}{0.87413} =1.6576 \\ \text{Since}\frac{\tan \alpha_3}{\tan \alpha_2} =\frac{\rho_3}{\rho_2} ,\text{then }\tan \alpha_3=1.6576 \times 2.4751=4.1028 \text{ or } \alpha_3=76.3^\circ.

Figure 12.36 illustrates the vaned versus vaneless diffuser. Note that the outlet diameter of the vaneless diffuser is much greater than the vaned diffuser. In addition, the outlet angle from the radial direction is greater in the case of vaneless diffuser than vaned diffuser.

12.36

Related Answered Questions