Holooly Plus Logo

Question 3.12: Compressibility Factor Compare incompressible vs. compressib......

Compressibility Factor
Compare incompressible vs. compressible stagnation-point flow of an ideal gas and express the difference in terms of the compressibility factor

\rm \left.\beta \equiv\frac{{p}_{s}-{p}_{0}}{\left(\mathrm{p}_{s}-\mathrm{{p}}_{0}\,\right){\Big|_{\rho=¢}}}=\frac{{p}_{s}-\mathrm{{p}}_{0}}{\frac{\rho_0}{2}u_0^2 }\right.

as a function of Mach number \rm M_0=u_0/c and heat capacity ratio \rm k=c_p/c_v.

 

Concepts Assumptions Sketch
• Bernoulli’s Equation • Steady isentropic flow, i.e., frictionless adiabatic
• Ideal Gas Law
• Mach # Correlation
Step-by-Step
The 'Blue Check Mark' means that this solution was answered by an expert.
Learn more on how do we answer questions.

(A) Incompressible Flow: Applying Bernoulli between pointⓢ 0 anⓓ s with Δz = 0 and u _ s =0 at the stagnation point,

\mathrm{p}_{s}=\mathrm{p}_{0}+\frac{\mathsf{\rho}}{2}\mathrm{u}_{0}^{2}                               (E.3.12.1)

Thus, with ρ_0 = ρ_s = ρ for incompressible flow (see given β – definition):

\rm \beta={\frac{{ p}_{s}-{ p}_{0}}{\rho{u}_{0}^{2}\;/2}}\equiv1

To express the stagnation point temperature, we use (see ideal gas):

\rm {\frac{T_{s}}{T_{0}}}={\frac{\bf p_{s}}{\bf p_{0}}}                       (E.3.12.2a)

so that with Eq. (E.3.12.1):

\rm {T}_{{s}}={ T}_{0}\bigl({ p}_{{{s}}}/{ p}_{0})={T}_{0}\Biggl[{ l}+\frac{{u}_{0}^{2}}{2}\left\lgroup\frac{ \rho}{ p}_{0}\right\rgroup \Biggr]                         ( E.3.12.2b)

Employing the ideal gas law in the form \rm \rho/p_0=(RT_0)^{-1}, we rewrite
Eq. (E.3.12.2b) as:

\rm T_s=t_0+\frac{u_0^2}{2R}                         (E.3.12.2c)

(B) Compressible Flow: For this situation, Bernoulli’s equation reads:

\rm \int\frac{dp}{\rho}+\frac{u^2}{2}=¢        (E.3.12.3a)

Expressing ρ as ρ(p) = (p / C)^{1/k}, C ≡ p^{1/k} / ρ , we can integrate the first term, i.e.,

\rm \int \frac{dp}{\rho} =\frac{k}{k-1} \left\lgroup\frac{p}{\rho} \right\rgroup + constant

Hence, Eq. (E.3.12.3a) now reads:

\rm \frac{k}{k-1} \frac{p}{\rho}+\frac{u^2}{2} =¢                       (E.3.12.3b)

Applying Eq. (E.3.12.3b) to points ⓪ and ⓢ yields:

\rm \frac{k}{k-1} \left\lgroup\frac{ps}{\rho_s} \right\rgroup =\frac{k}{k-1} \left\lgroup\frac{p_0}{\rho_0} \right\rgroup +\frac{u_0^2}{2}                 (E.3.12.3c)

Expressing Eq. (3.12.3c) again in terms of \rm T_s with the equation of state p / ρ = RT , we have

\rm \mathrm{T}_{s}=\mathrm{T}_{0}+\frac{\mathrm{k}-1}{\mathrm{k}}\frac{\mathrm{u}_{0}^{2}}{2\mathrm{R}}                     (E.3.12.4a)

Comparing (E.3.12.4a) with (E.3.12.2c) it is already evident that the second-term coefficient (k − 1)/k (≈0.3 for air) captures the difference between incompressible and compressible flows. In order to express β in terms of the Mach number, we use Eq. (3.42b) which provides \rm kR=c^2/T_0~\text{and}~u_0^2/c^2\equiv M_0^2, i.e.,

\rm c=\sqrt{kRT}                              (3.42b)

\rm T_{s}={\mathrm T_{0}}\!\left[1+\frac{1}{2}({ k}-1){ M}_{0}^{2}\right]                            (E.3.12.4b)

Now, with Eq. (3.39) we obtain

\rm\frac{T_2}{T_1}=\left\lgroup\frac{p_2}{p_1} \right\rgroup^{(k-1)/k} \qquad\text{and}\qquad\frac{p_2}{p_1}=\left\lgroup\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1} \right\rgroup ^k                                          (3.39/40)

\rm { p}_{s}={ p}_{0}\left\lgroup\frac{{T}_{z}}{{ T}_{0}}\right\rgroup ^{\frac{k}{{ k}-1}}={ p}_{0}\left\lgroup1+\frac{{ k}-1}{2}{ M}_{0}^{2}\right\rgroup ^{\frac{k}{{ k}-1}}                            (E.3.12.5a)

For subsonic flow \rm \frac{k-1}{2}M_0^2\lt 1 and Eq. (E.3.12.5a) can be expanded with the binominal theorem to (see App. A):

\rm \frac{{ p}_{s}}{{ p}_{0}}=\left\lgroup 1+\frac{{ k}-1}2\,{ M}_{0}^{2}\right\rgroup^{\frac{k}{k-1}}:\approx1+\frac{{ k}}2\,{ M}_{0}^{2}+\frac{{ k}}8\,{ M}_{0}^{4}+\frac{{ k}(2-{ k})}{48}{ M}_{0}^{6}+\ldots               (E.3.12.5b)

In order to form the compressibility factor, we rearrange (E.3.12.5b) as

\rm \mathrm{p}_{s}-{ p}_{0}=\frac{ k}2{p}_{0}{ M}_{0}^{2}\biggl[1+\frac{1}{4}{ M}_{0}^{2}+\frac{2-{\bf k}}{24}{ M}_{0}^{4}+…\biggr]                        (E.3.12.5c)

However, by definition the factor

\rm \frac{\mathrm{k}}{2}{p}_{0}{ M}_{0}^{2}=\frac{\mathrm{k}}{2}{ p}_{0}\frac{{ u}_{0}^{2}}{\mathrm{k}{ p}_{0}~/{ \rho}_{0}}=\rho_{0}\frac{\mathrm{u}_{0}^{2}}{2}

so that

\rm \mathrm{p}_{s}-\mathrm{p}_{o}=\frac{ \rho_{o}}2u_{0}^{2}\bigg[1+\frac14{ M}_{0}^{2}+\frac{2- k}{24}{ M}_{0}^{4}+…\bigg]                         (E.3.12.5d)

Finally,

\rm \frac{{p_s-p}_{0}}{\frac{\rho_{0}}{2}{u}_{0}^{2}}\equiv\beta =1+\frac{1}{4}{ M}_{0}^{2}+\frac{2-{ k}}{24}{ M}_{0}^{4}+…

Graph:

Comment: The graph β(M) indicates that for M < 0.3 in air (being an ideal gas), the error in assuming incompressible flow is less than 2%; however, at M = 1 the error is 28%.

example 3.12

Related Answered Questions