Determining E^\circ_{cell} and ΔG°
Consider the redox reaction
Zn^{2+}(aq) + H_2(g) + 2 H_2O(\ell) → Zn(s) + 2 H_3O^+(aq)
Use the standard reduction potentials in Table 18.1 to calculate E^\circ_{cell} and ΔG° and to determine whether the reaction as written favors product formation.
Table 18.1 Standard Reduction Potentials in Aqueous Solution at 25 °C* | ||
Reduction Half-Reaction | E° (V) | |
F_2(g) + 2 e^- | →2 F^-(aq) | + 2.87 |
H_2O_2(aq) + 2 H_3O^+(aq) + 2 e^- | →4 H2O(\ell) | + 1.77 |
PbO_2(s) + SO_4^{2-} (aq) + 4 H_3O^+(aq) +2 e^- | →PbSO_4 (s) +6 H_2O(\ell) | + 1.685 |
MnO_4^-(aq) + 8 H_3O^+(aq) + 5 e^- | →Mn^{2+}(aq) +12 H_2O(\ell) | + 1.51 |
Au^{3+}(aq) + 3 e^- | →Au(s) | + 1.50 |
Cl_2(g) + 2 e^- | →2 Cl^-(aq) | + 1.358 |
Cr_2O_7^{2-}(aq) + 14 H_3O^+(aq) + 6 e^- | →2 Cr^{3+}(aq) + 21 H_2O(\ell) | + 1.33 |
O_2(g) + 4 H_3O^+(aq) + 4 e^- | →6 H_2O(\ell) | + 1.229 |
Br_2 (\ell) + 2 e^- | →2 Br^-(aq) | + 1.066 |
NO_3^-(aq) + 4 H_3O^+(aq) + 3 e^- | →NO(g) + 6 H_2O(\ell) | + 0.96 |
OCl^-(aq) + H_2O(\ell) + 2 e^- | →Cl^-(aq) + 2 OH^-(aq) | + 0.89 |
Hg^{2+}(aq) + 2 e^- | →Hg(\ell) | + 0.855 |
Ag^+(aq) + e^- | →Ag(s) | + 0.7994 |
Hg_2^{2+}(aq) + 2 e^- | →2 Hg(\ell) | + 0.789 |
Fe^{3+}(aq) + e^- | →Fe^{2+}(aq) | + 0.771 |
I_2 (s) + 2 e^- | →2 I^-(aq) | + 0.535 |
O_2(g) + 2 H_2O(\ell) + 4 e^- | →4 OH^-(aq) | + 0.403 |
Cu^{2+}(aq) + 2 e^- | →Cu(s) | + 0.337 |
Sn^{4+}(aq) + 2 e^- | →Sn^{2+}(aq) | + 0.15 |
2 H_3O^+(aq) + 2 e^- | →H_2(g) + 2 H_2O(\ell) | 0.00 |
Sn^{2+}(aq) + 2 e^- | →Sn(s) | – 0.14 |
Ni^{2+}(aq) + 2 e^- | →Ni(s) | – 0.25 |
PbSO_4 (s) + 2 e^- | →Pb(s) + SO_4^{2-}(aq) | – 0.356 |
Cd^{2+}(aq) + 2 e^- | →Cd(s) | – 0.403 |
Fe^{2+}(aq) + 2 e^- | →Fe(s) | – 0.44 |
Zn^{2+}(aq) + 2 e^- | →Zn(s) | – 0.763 |
2 H_2O(\ell) + 2 e^- | →H_2(g) + 2 OH^-(aq) | – 0.8277 |
Al^{3+}(aq) + 3 e^- | →Al(s) | – 1.66 |
Mg^{2+}(aq) + 2 e^- | →Mg(s) | – 2.37 |
Na^+(aq) + e^- | →Na(s) | – 2.714 |
K^+(aq) + e^- | →K(s) | – 2.925 |
Li^+(aq) + e^- | →Li (s) | – 3.045 |
*In volts (V) versus the standard hydrogen electrode. |
E^\circ_{cell} = – 0.763 V; ΔG° = 147 kJ. The reaction as written is not product-favored.
Strategy and Explanation The first step is to write the half-reactions for the oxidation and reduction that occur and to use their standard reduction potentials from Table 18.1.
Reduction: Zn^{2+}(aq) + 2 e^-→ Zn(s) E^\circ_{cathode} = – 0.763 V
Oxidation: H_2(g) + 2 H_2O(\ell) → 2 H_3O^+(aq) + 2 e^- E^\circ_{node} = 0 V
We obtain the E^\circ_{cell} for the reaction from the standard reduction potentials for the two halfreactions.
E^\circ_{cell} = E^\circ_{cathode} – E^\circ_{anode} = – 0.763 V – 0 V = – 0.763 V
Since E^\circ_{cell} is negative, the reaction is not product-favored in the direction written. Zn^{2+} will not oxidize H_2O. The reverse reaction is product-favored; that is, zinc metal reacts with acid.
From the calculated E^\circ_{cell} we can calculate ΔG°.
ΔG° =- nFE^\circ_{cell}
= – (2 mol e^-) × (\frac{9.65 × 10^4 C}{1 mol e^-})(\frac{1 J}{1 V × 1 C})(- 0.763 V)
= 1.47 × 10^5 J = 147 kJ
The positive value for ΔG° also shows that the reaction as written is not product-favored.
Reasonable Answer Check The given oxidation is the half-reaction at the standard hydrogen electrode with a potential of zero, so the overall reaction is governed by the Zn reduction. The negative cell potential and the positive ΔG° are consistent with the reaction being reactant-favored as written.